katoumegumiosu said:
nah
Posted under General
katoumegumiosu said:
nah
winnyace said:
What the fuck do you mean 'nah'? She's 15 canonically.
If you click the tag and read the wiki, it becomes more obvious what loli is defined as on this site.
But basically, it doesn't matter if the character is a minor or looks like a minor, it matters if they look pre puberty.
And this?
post #3150855
Vanniaa067 said:
And this?
post #3150855
Borderline, I would say its cutting it on the loli tag for sure.
santander said:
1. The bottom half is developed enough for petite to me.
2. definitely loli
santander said:
Yes.
Third time: And this?...
post #3488590
Vanniaa067 said:
Third time: And this?...
post #3488590
no
This one I'm not sure, but better to be safe than sorry.
As there's a child watching the sex, does it deserve the loli tag?
Jerrcheron said:
This one I'm not sure, but better to be safe than sorry.
Shota.
Freshblink said:
As there's a child watching the sex, does it deserve the loli tag?
nope
Freshblink said:
As there's a child watching the sex, does it deserve the loli tag?
Only if the child is the focus, another example is this:
post #5755133
Vanniaa067 said:
Only if the child is the focus, another example is this:
post #5755133
Did not realize you could even tag child into explicit posts, neat, I will do that from now on if its just voyeurism.