Posted under General
kyurorii said:
i cant find the source, but i found this on other site
edit: nevermind, i think the souce is from fanbox and maybe that was paid reward
Even if it's a third-party_source you should provide it in the source field. Some approvers, me included, are ignoring stuff that has no source at all.
Nacha said:
Even if it's a third-party_source you should provide it in the source field. Some approvers, me included, are ignoring stuff that has no source at all.
okay noted
zenzeni99 said:
post #9313098
post #9313125
post #9313157
post #9313179
post #9313189
post #9313200
post #9313227
post #9313234
was this entire comic really that bad?
can these get a second look or at least some feedback please, 8 deletions is kind of a lot
Metalhead33 said:
post #9456563
post #9456565
post #9456567
post #9456569Please give these 4 a second chance. Their parent got approved. Why not approve these 4 too?
4 deletions is a lot too x3
Metalhead33 said:
Seriously, if someone is so "disinteretested" in a work, then just ignore it instead of disapproving.
I personally want to be serious on this problem. I've seen posts with hundreds of upvotes getting "disintrested" disapprovals.
I accept the truth that danbooru is a subjective site, but I think we should be lenient to those pics people like.
Updated by ZeroAurora
ZeroAurora said:
I personally want to be serious on this problem. I've seen posts with hundreds of upvotes getting "disintrested" disapprovals.
I accept the truth that danbooru is a subjective site, but I think we should be lenient to those pics people like.
All "disinterest" means is that an Approver looked at it and didn't approve it. The Approvers don't have control over the message; it's completely automated. The only ways to stop it from appearing would be either to approve it or not look at the post in the first place, which means the Approvers would stop looking through the modqueue, which means nothing would get approved. If you have a problem with the phrasing, then you can propose an alternative, but the message isn't going anywhere.
Edit: Sorry, I was mistaken. They do actually have to push a button (forum #362750). My fault for going out of my lane and making hasty assumptions about the modqueue.
Updated by Blank User
Blank_User said:
All "disinterest" means is that an Approver looked at it and didn't approve it. The Approvers don't have control over the message; it's completely automated. The only ways to stop it from appearing would be either to approve it or not look at the post in the first place, which means the Approvers would stop looking through the modqueue, which means nothing would get approved. If you have a problem with the phrasing, then you can propose an alternative, but the message isn't going anywhere.
Thanks for explaining - I had no idea about how it works until now.
One thing I would suggest is to clearify how this works, in some wiki page I'd say.
As for phrasing, I would choose "no action" in mod event page, and for the result box:
It has been reviewed by 15 approvers.
15 did not like the post enough to approve it.15 did not react to the post.
Updated by ZeroAurora
ZeroAurora said:
Thanks for explaining - I had no idea about how it works until now.
One thing I would suggest is to clearify how this works, in some wiki page I'd say.
Disclaimer: personal suggestions
As for phrasing, I would choose "no action" in mod event page, and for the result box:
I'd make a separate thread for this so it doesn't sidetrack this one and doesn't get buried under a bunch of new posts.
Odd request, because I am the artist of a few of the works I've uploaded here and I already had a few of my works on Danbooru before, but I wanted to upload a few more of my recent works that I consider better quality to my old gallery and to properly tag my illustrations.
But why were these posts all consistently not approved? (first two are uploaded by myself and I consider "good" quality, last one was uploaded by one of my fans but was still deleted)
post #9352994
post #9352769
post #9001742
Where as these posts (that are arguably of worse quality and also original work by myself but reuploaded by other people) were approved? (over half of the gallery under my name honestly, is of worse quality than my recently deleted uploads) (edit: added more examples by myself)
post #5941300
post #7481411
post #4551972
post #4673306
post #4718648
This one was also originally not approved until I submitted an appeal, but this one had a decent amount of bookmarks and is literally officially commissioned by Hoyoverse, yet was still deleted originally until I submitted an appeal.
post #9102579
So I'm really struggling to see what the actual criteria for art to remain up on Danbooru actually is? Is it quality, name recognition, or just whether approvers like it or not? Because if it's the latter, I'd ask them to reconsider or atleast provide some clarification.
Updated by nicojian
nicojian said:
Odd request, because I am the artist of a few of the works I've uploaded here and I already had a few of my works on Danbooru before, but I wanted to upload a few more of my recent works that I consider better quality to my old gallery and to properly tag my illustrations.
But why were these posts all consistently not approved? (first two are uploaded by myself and I consider "good" quality, last one was uploaded by one of my fans but was still deleted)
post #9352994
post #9352769
post #9001742Where as these posts (that are arguably of worse quality and also original work by myself but reuploaded by other people) were approved? (over half of the gallery under my name honestly, is of worse quality than my recently deleted uploads) (edit: added more examples by myself)
post #5941300
post #7481411
post #4551972
post #4673306
post #4718648This one was also originally not approved until I submitted an appeal, but this one had a decent amount of bookmarks and is literally officially commissioned by Hoyoverse, yet was still deleted originally until I submitted an appeal.
post #9102579So I'm really struggling to see what the actual criteria for art to remain up on Danbooru actually is? Is it quality, name recognition, or just whether approvers like it or not? Because if it's the latter, I'd ask them to reconsider or atleast provide some clarification.
If I've heard earlier here from a post buried here, I think selfuploads are subject to a bit more scrutiny or approvers don't look much there
Overall I think it's an activity thing. I suppose it's because this month isn't as busy as it is and not as much contributors are active based off what I've noticed. But (infuriatingly so), it's the mercy of approvers finding it good or not
Siknakaliux said:
If I've heard earlier here from a post buried here, I think selfuploads are subject to a bit more scrutiny or approvers don't look much there
Just to clarify, there is currently no official policy against self-uploads. However, that does not guarantee Approvers will treat them like any other post.
Time for a summer clean-up.
post #9344037 : Siblings were approved.
post #9357669
post #9363736
post #9395055 / post #9401580 : Are these any different than the artist's approved posts?
post #9163484 : Ditto
post #9404152
post #9460445
AbsoluteRainbow said:
post #9348990 (related to a certain approved post, maybe a possible sibling/child post)
Would-be sibling: post #9099541
Please give post #9348990 at least something
Metalhead33 said:
post #9456563
post #9456565
post #9456567
post #9456569Please give these 4 a second chance. Their parent got approved. Why not approve these 4 too?
Don't tell me that ya'll gonna let post #9468948 get deleted too. (uploaded 2 days ago)
High-quality. Made by an artist whose works constantly get approved.
12 instances of "disinterest".
*sigh*
Updated by Metalhead33
Can someone explain what is wrong with these works/why they were deleted? Posts of similar quality by the same artist have been approved.
post #9444485
post #9417047
post #9302483 (Parent and child)
post #9369032 (Parent and child)
Siknakaliux said:
If I've heard earlier here from a post buried here, I think selfuploads are subject to a bit more scrutiny or approvers don't look much there
Overall I think it's an activity thing. I suppose it's because this month isn't as busy as it is and not as much contributors are active based off what I've noticed. But (infuriatingly so), it's the mercy of approvers finding it good or not
That's fine, but my Jane animation, FBI, and OSS illustrations weren't uploaded by myself yet were still mass disapproved by what, 8-9 approvers each time? + some of the recent self-uploads were also reviewed by 9 approvers and all disapproved. The Jane animation had over 30 favourites before still being disapproved. Yet so much of my old art gallery that I consider of poor quality was approved in the past, so I am incredibly confused as to the criteria is. Why was my old work considered fine, yet all of my recent work is enough to be consistently labeled as "bad" and deleted? I only started to upload some of my work here because people already were re-upping my work, and as a public art site I wanted to add some of the works I consider of higher quality here, but it's genuinely a bit infuriating to want to upload more recent original artwork with proper tags and character tags, then to be told it's worse than amateur art that I did 3-4 years ago? I don't get it, I'll submit an appeal for a few of these works but I don't think these are of bad quality, they're all hand-drawn, were popular on Pixiv, and with proper tags from the original creator.
Works not uploaded by myself, appeal was denied already, but I do not think the quality is bad (compared to other works in my gallery):
post #8972260
post #9001742
Works uploaded by myself that I think deserve an appeal:
post #9352769
post #9352994
nicojian said:
That's fine, but my Jane animation, FBI, and OSS illustrations weren't uploaded by myself yet were still mass disapproved by what, 8-9 approvers each time? + some of the recent self-uploads were also reviewed by 9 approvers and all disapproved. The Jane animation had over 30 favourites before still being disapproved. Yet so much of my old art gallery that I consider of poor quality was approved in the past, so I am incredibly confused as to the criteria is. Why was my old work considered fine, yet all of my recent work is enough to be consistently labeled as "bad" and deleted? I only started to upload some of my work here because people already were re-upping my work, and as a public art site I wanted to add some of the works I consider of higher quality here, but it's genuinely a bit infuriating to want to upload more recent original artwork with proper tags and character tags, then to be told it's worse than amateur art that I did 3-4 years ago? I don't get it, I'll submit an appeal for a few of these works but I don't think these are of bad quality, they're all hand-drawn, were popular on Pixiv, and with proper tags from the original creator.
Works not uploaded by myself, appeal was denied already, but I do not think the quality is bad (compared to other works in my gallery):
post #8972260
post #9001742
Works uploaded by myself that I think deserve an appeal:
post #9352769
post #9352994
Also for some reason, it seems like I'm unable to submit an appeal for the last two despite having enough upload slots to do so. I don't know whether my account is just unable to appeal now, despite only having done so 3 times, or just a bug with the site. (edit: nevermind, somehow it's fixed for those two but I still can't appeal some posts)
Updated by nicojian
I'd like to know why the post was taken down.
I think the source and image quality are solid.
post #9466347
post #9466353
post #9466384
post #9466394
post #9466404
post #9466408
post #9238252
post #9238232
post #9199063
Please restore these three pieces, they are not offending in any way. It's just a unique style of drawing. Many of the same authors' works have not been removed on danbooru. Looking forward to your reply.
