Can I know why these were rejected?
Posted under General
Can I know why these were rejected?
post #9329741 got deleted after being seen by 6 reviewers. Was there something wrong with it?
Any reasons why these were rejected?
post #9292381
post #9308699
post #9331059
different Version
post #9277160
HD VERSION
AngryZapdos said:
[...]
Sorry, I was trying to echo what some user said in a previous feedback (forum #339273). I agree that I could have word it better, though.
I didn't know only approvers are meant to give feedback, thank you for telling me. The opening post should be edited to include that as a requeriment (or recommendation) to give feedback, its very easy to miss stuff like forum #355682 in a thread this big.
Not sure why the above post was not approved, since it's at the same level of quality as the artist's previous character sheets, such as post #9050841 and post #9050812.
post #9331750
How come this wasn't approved? The source is provided.
Maiguel said:
Sorry, I was trying to echo what some user said in a previous feedback (forum #339273). I agree that I could have word it better, though.
I didn't know only approvers are meant to give feedback, thank you for telling me. The opening post should be edited to include that as a requeriment (or recommendation) to give feedback, its very easy to miss stuff like forum #355682 in a thread this big.
The point being made in that forum post was that if you’re not an Approver, you’re not approving posts, and therefore are not in a position to say why it wasn’t approved because you lack the ability to approve it. On the other hand, anyone can become knowledgeable about how the site works. The main problem with your comment was that it is misleading.
If a user is asking something like “Why is my post not approved when it has 10 likes?” or “But these (Contributor-uploaded) posts were approved!”, I think any knowledgeable user, not just Approvers, should be able to correct those kind of obvious misconceptions.
post #9326884
post #9332629
post #9333323
Anything wrong with these?
Time for some cleaning:
post #9333605 : Seen by 6 approvers.post #9333534 : Ditto.post #9220795 : Unless it's the foreshortening of her left arm caused by the backlighting?
post #9163484 : Don't understand this one.
post #8859342 : Same as above.post #8782971 : Same as above.
Updated by NoIdea4GoodName
post #9273511
post #9273466
post #9257875
post #9295621
post #9252792
post #9219134
post #9215684
post #9214067
post #9193414
post #9268362
Okay, listen. I'm well aware TS is niche content. But still, I firmly believe these are perfectly good, and the only reason they aren't getting approved is
because you guys are biased against them.
Updated by asgembed . js
post #9335728
post #9314624
post #9301180
post #9294916
post #9321329
post #9299856
post #9279442
post #9327344
I think these posts deserve another chance, please send feedback.
Why is it rejected or deleted? Please tell me.
I don't see any problem with the quality of the illustrations or the tagging. Why is that really?
Disapproval is also only indifferent, or few people appreciate it in the first place, and I don't know why.
post #9279369
post #9262753
post #9242537
post #9188154
post #9332619
post #9332634
post #9289842
post #9289791
post #9287121
post #9280689
post #9267498
post #9336345
post #6403786
post #9276860
Can someone take a look at these three, especially the third one since its parent got approved.
post #9334627
post #9334647
post #9334677
post #9334696
post #9334711
Is there any problem with Western content?
DudeDum said:
post #9334627
post #9334647
post #9334677
post #9334696
post #9334711
Is there any problem with Western content?
Approvers will never outright admit it, but they're pretty biased against certain artstyles and content, yes.
post #9316669
post #9316892
post #9280671
post #9228529
Feedback would be helpful!
