Why was this post post #7875613 removed?
Posted under General
Why was this post post #7875613 removed?
gfgg062 said:
Why was this post post #7875613 removed?
It's literally a clip from a commercially licensed anime, which is strictly against the upload rules. Edit: sniped.
malachite_reaper said:
"poor quality" doesn't necessarily mean "did not take effort;" it often just means "this is bad to look at." being hand-drawn rather than a collage doesn't impact that.
Oh, no, I understand that. I just don't get what warranted the quality check in general is what I meant. Not specifically because it's handdrawn, but because I'm unsure what else would be the issue with it besides horror theme and looking like a collage at first glance.
These ones please.
post #7854291
post #7854299
post #7856145
post #7856156
looking for feedback on:
post #7879887 and post #7892091 - one piece naturally seems to be very popular here and these didn't look particularly bad compared to the active posts featuring this specific character.
post #7870666 - this one got unapproved twice (not my appeal) despite not looking much different to most things scott pilgrim i have posted so far.
post #7842740 - not too different from the several morrigan/spider-man pieces in here, thought it was pretty nice (and i certainly wasn't the only one to think so).
i did notice all of these introduce new artist tags and i understand if that may be a deterrent on their approval, but i'm interested to know what's the holdup on these. as someone who joined just a few weeks ago it helps me know what's good and what isn't around these parts. really appreciate it.
Why was this deleted?
post #7890566
Alot of my upload keep not past... is my eyes for quality really that bad?
post #7880606
post #7863314
post #7885584
post #7885630
post #7885703
post #7890080
post #7890317
post #7890404
post #7830881
post #7849517
was it because of the poor tagging?
What's wrong with this?
post #7889535
was there an artist blunder in this post or poor tagging?
post #7893807
post #7893809
pablo.gonzales.2007 said:
was there an artist blunder in this post or poor tagging?
post #7893807
post #7893809
The first post is completely fine and not different at all from other's posts by the same artists, try to appeal it.
The second post on the other side is a cropped image to go to the artist Patreon and support her. My advice? Never upload those, I think it pollutes the site and we already have the paid reward available tag.
Mazwell said:
was it because of the poor tagging?
Maybe too sketchy for the standards of the site, but not enough bad to qualify as bad quality. And your tagging is not bad for a novice; while tagging is completely essential and not optional, note that most of the Approvers focus on the quality of the post and the tagging abilities are rarely taken into consideration when approving.
Updated by user 1099148
SlaughteredMelon said:
The first post is completely fine and not different at all from other's posts by the same artists, try to appeal it.
The second post on the other side is a cropped image to go to the artist Patreon and support her. My advice? Never upload those, I think it pollutes the site and we already have the paid reward available tag.
so that means, with paid reward available tag, i can post paid reward art there?
pablo.gonzales.2007 said:
so that means, with paid reward available tag, i can post paid reward art there?
NO. That's against the Upload Rules! We had a paid reward tag in the past, but now uploading paid rewards is no longer allowed.
This comic again...Only got checked by five approvers too...
post #7840169 what wrong for this?
NPEE2003 said:
post #7840169 what wrong for this?
the tiny head of Lumine is what I notice first