Implicating bioshock_2 -> bioshock.
Implicating bioshock_infinite -> bioshock.
Reason: Series. Should there be a bioshock_1 tag?
Updated by jxh2154
Posted under General
Implicating bioshock_2 -> bioshock.
Implicating bioshock_infinite -> bioshock.
Reason: Series. Should there be a bioshock_1 tag?
Updated by jxh2154
T5J8F8 said:
Implicating bioshock_2 -> bioshock.
Implicating bioshock_infinite -> bioshock.Reason: Series. Should there be a bioshock_1 tag?
The series tag should probably be BioShock_(series) but I'm not sure if the first game should get a 1 attached to it or not. I'd be in favour of leaving the first game as BioShock.
Precedent says it should be BioShock (no qualifier) for the series, and BioShock 1 for the first game. Look at Final Fantasy as a generic series name with Final Fantasy I as the first instance of it.
Shinjidude said:
Precedent says it should be BioShock (no qualifier) for the series, and BioShock 1 for the first game. Look at Final Fantasy as a generic series name with Final Fantasy I as the first instance of it.
I played the FF series but never the BioShock series. That said, I agree with that naming logic, because it is intuitive and self-explanatory enough:
Shinjidude said:
Look at Final Fantasy as a generic series name with Final Fantasy I as the first instance of it.
And just for the "record", this is justified by the GBA release(s).
It was also more or less set as policy I believe about 2 years ago, sometime shortly before forum #15583 (probably somewhere in the massive "Tag alias/implication discussion" thread, forum #7689, but I can't find it ATM).
Updated
Danielx21 said:
I played the FF series but never the BioShock series.
It means you didn't got my joke back then. Too bad.
Back on topic. I second what reese said, i.e.:
with all three being implicated to bioshock_(series).