Vandal that tags newhalfs as otoko_no_ko
Posted under General
Vandal that tags newhalfs as otoko_no_ko
feftak said:
Vandal that tags newhalfs as otoko_no_ko
Honestly you're quite the tag vandal yourself retagging images where the artists stated it's crossdressing with 1girl or so tags because they appear to have breasts, as if crossdressing can't include breast padding.
Don't twist this around.
feftak said:
Vandal that tags newhalfs as otoko_no_ko
You can't defend these vandalisms:
post #5578650
post #6464685
post #7402515
Looking at the post history, you are also engaged in tag vandalism in most of these.
gfz said:
Looking at the post history, you are also engaged in tag vandalism in most of these.
No.
Rule of Thumb
Tag what you see, not what you know. In other words, only tag the visual and factual elements in the image.
Is what I'm doing.
feftak said:
No.
First of all, you need to learn what Rule of Thumb means. There are exceptions to that, first and foremost being otoko no ko.
Secondly, regardless of whether or not the tags you're adding are correct, having edit wars with other users is unproductive, and coming here to complain about other users doing the same thing you're doing is ridiculous.
Instead of edit warring back and forth all day, either figure it out in DMs or ask for an outside opinion in topic #12251.
gfz said:
First of all, you need to learn what Rule of Thumb means. There are exceptions to that, first and foremost being otoko no ko.
Secondly, regardless of whether or not the tags you're adding are correct, having edit wars with other users is unproductive, and coming here to complain about other users doing the same thing you're doing is ridiculous.
Instead of edit warring back and forth all day, either figure it out in DMs or ask for an outside opinion in topic #12251.
First of all, so is newhalf/futanari.
Secondly, we're not doing the same thing.
Finally, in topic #12251 no one has yet replied to my question.
Finally, in topic #12251 no one has yet replied to my question.
That's true, we promised to solve Edit Wars, and we failed to keep that promise. And we blame people when they still try to keep the tags right.
Something should be done about that, probably a dedicated edit war solving topic.
Anyway, I don't think that tagging trans girls and otoko no ko characters as futanari + mtf genderswap, when they have breast, is the right way.
feftak said:
First of all, so is newhalf/futanari.
Secondly, we're not doing the same thing.
Finally, in topic #12251 no one has yet replied to my question.
When the people reverting your edits are admins, yes, you're doing the same thing.
reg_panda said:
Anyway, I don't think that tagging trans girls and otoko no ko characters as futanari + mtf genderswap, when they have breast, is the right way.
They're not trans girls and otoko no ko. They're newhalfs or futanari. All of them.
feftak said:
Vandal that tags newhalfs as otoko_no_ko
This vandal made a new account: user #1182461
does the same thing: tags futanari and newhalf as otoko_no_ko
user #1181491 still doing nothing but changing girl Bridget posts and newhalfs to otoko no ko after already having a sockpuppet banned for it.
I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt and send them a friendly dmail but now I see that they're just trolling.
Edit: They just reverted a bunch of posts for a third time. I'm not going to keep warring with them since clearly they're just going to keep going back and forth 
Updated by Confetto
Heartcatcher said:
user #1181491 still doing nothing but changing girl Bridget posts and newhalfs to otoko no ko after already having a sockpuppet banned for it.
I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt and send them a friendly dmail but now I see that they're just trolling.
Edit: They just reverted a bunch of posts for a third time. I'm not going to keep warring with them since clearly they're just going to keep going back and forth
I've done my duty by reporting them here, not my problem anymore
I recognise that guy from Gelbooru, where he had the exact same name and modus operandi. It's definitely a troll.
Warring on post #7519330 changing it to 2boys otoko_no_ko even though there's breasts and no visible bulge or penis whatsoever because it's blocked by the bear. Goes back ages and an admin has removed implied_yaoi before.
Edit: I think it'd be implied_futanari if anything?
Updated by Confetto
Heterochromia with one eye closed.
Penis in pantyhose.
This user just spams related tags on every post and refuses to correct it or improve.
It's actually very egregious. It's even hard to see which tags are even close to applying on the above post.
Updated by Dannk
Dannk said:
Heterochromia with one eye closed.
Penis in pantyhose.
This user just spams related tags on every post and refuses to correct it or improve.It's actually very egregious. It's even hard to see which tags are even close to applying on the above post.
Banned.
user #1218245, AnonyFizz, made some questionable changes to artist entries/created new ones that are redundant. I sent a DMail to them, telling them not to do that, and today they've renamed the old entry (artist #343572) to "deletedartist" and made two new artist entries (artist #457758 and artist #457759)
It looks like they want to separate identities here, but they're being quite rude about it by not communicating.
I should reiterate that these entries listed are all the same person, user included.