create implication miyako_yoshika_(cosplay) + kasodani_kyouko_(cosplay) -> cosplay

miyako_yoshika_(cosplay) -> cosplay
kasodani_kyouko_(cosplay) -> cosplay

reason: the former are part of the latter.

sonozaki_mion_(cosplay) -> cosplay

Cosplay tags are better off manually added. Similar to character -> copyright implications, the sheer volume of characters and potential cosplays makes implications unfeasible.

Hillside_Moose said:
Cosplay tags are better off manually added. Similar to character -> copyright implications, the sheer volume of characters and potential cosplays makes implications unfeasible.

The various weapon implications thread had a ton of stuff, if its okay, I could compile a similar list for all the different possible cosplay combinations if that is the problem.

No it is not the problem, there are 45*50 _(cosplay) tags and that many implications will never happen. It doesn't matter anyways I check a large majority of them once a month as it is.

At the least, we could implicate the most commonly cosplayed characters.

forum #11676 I really doubt jxh's stance has changed regardless in the shift in numbers.

Don't worry about it. I mean I check *_(cosplay) -cosplay every day, and even if I left I'm sure someone else would figure it out.

That query doesn't even work properly, just fyi. Wildcard + negation of the same metatype has not and will not ever do what it's supposed to do. I find dozens of images missing cosplay every time I check the far more involved way.

Of course they don't work.

I still maintain that even with the long way it's not a problem. Though I'd change once a day to once every week or two.

As mentioned, we don't do character -> trait tags, and this is a variant on that (and a more extensive one, even). Some things should just be manually gardened.

Besides, I guarantee the site would implode if we tried to put through 2200+ implications.