Posted under General
The concept is simple: panties that are visible beneath one's pantyhose.
Examples: post #380879, post #579682, post #792837.
A few candidates for a tag name (with my vote going to the first variant) would include:
panties_under_pantyhose
panties_underneath_pantyhose
panties_below_pantyhose
panties_behind_pantyhose
The panties and pantyhose tags would obviously need to be implicated.
Thanks.
Updated by jxh2154
A few days ago I was looking for the exact tag you're suggesting. It seems like it already existed at some point in the past. I'll second the suggestion for panties_under_pantyhose.
Do you suggest using them for
1. -pantyhose_pull -panty_pull only, or
==both worn, one under the other
2. pantyhose_pull -panty_pull and/or
==both (half) worn, but one NOT under the other
3. pantyhose_pull panty_pull
==both (half) worn, MAY BE under the other
where post #792837 is somewhere between 1. and 2.
Sample (60 pictures pantyhose panties
first 3 pages: from post #792839 to post #782021
42/60 fit the criteria
44/60 fit if pantyhose_pull panty_pull included
48/60 fit if all *pull included
06/60 unclear
06/60 don't fit
post #789630
can't tell if pantyhose exists at all = doesn't fit
post #785186 -- pantyhose_pull panty_pull
both pull, panties are under the pantyhose as described
torn_pantyhose panties are all under unclear, should those be included? In some, the panties are under the pantyhose, in others they're not
All in all, with the minimum 42/60, you'd have to sort out ~1/3 of all pictures if you search for just pantyhose panties if there is any number of people in the picture.
S1eth said:
post #789630
can't tell if pantyhose exists at all = doesn't fit
I think that's it on her right leg. Doesn't look like the bandages at least.
In terms of the format of the tag, I'd say panties_under_pantyhose, similar to swimsuit_under_clothes.
Honestly, I'd only use the tag if the pantyhose are covering the panties. If the pantyhose are pulled down beneath the panties, then just tag panties pantyhose.
Oops, kinda forgot about this thread. But yes, I'd have to agree with you there, jxh. I'll go ahead and create a Wiki entry for the panties_under_pantyhose tag to let people know it has to be under that criterion.
We could also use some aliases and implications for the tag too. Could we alias the three tag variants listed in the OP, and create the implications mentioned there too?
I'd still like to know how to handle torn_pantyhose panties.
post #794527 is clear (yes), but what about post #801125 (probably yes) and post #779990 (no?)
S1eth said:
I'd still like to know how to handle torn_pantyhose panties.
post #794527 is clear (yes), but what about post #801125 (probably yes) and post #779990 (no?)
It's okay for tags like this to sometimes be an imperfect judgment call. So just use your best judgment. I'd say that is a reasonable portion of the pantyhose is still intact over the panties, go for it.
1 and 2 in your examples are yes, 3 is a no.
