Imply presenting_removed_panties -> unworn_panties

Posted under Tags

Placeholder1996 said in forum #445895:

This is a BUR I'd considered a couple times, but I never got around to it, partly because I couldn't decide if it would be better to have it imply unworn panties or holding panties. Holding panties also does not imply unworn panties. Nevermind, it does imply holding panties. Never make forum posts while being sleep deprived.

Despite the crossed out part, this made me think. If holding panties implied unworn panties instead of panties, there would be no need for this BUR.

And the holding panties wiki does mention unworn panties as part of its definition too, which I hadn’t seen yet.

Old: however, an image like post #11558880 comes to mind: panties held around the legs, during a panty pull. The definition of unworn panties excludes panties being pulled down, so unworn panties can’t be tagged. Does it count as holding panties? As the current wikis say, no, so I guess it would enable an alternate BUR, but it also means restricting in what way panties are being held for them to be tagged or not. Similar case in post #1578027.

Edit: actually, the posts I mentioned are likely missing tags like pulling own clothes/pulling another's clothes, so holding panties can be removed.

Replaced a few tags, I understand it now.

Updated by aster1a

aster1a said in forum #446005:

BUR #61237 is pending approval.

create implication holding_panties -> unworn_panties
remove implication holding_panties -> panties

Alternate BUR. If this is approved, the previous BUR is unnecessary.

On a sidenote, holding panties implies holding underwear which implies holding unworn clothes.

I think you can present something without actually holding them. Like putting it on a tray or this post #11598850. Although that post still have holding panties tagged. Is holding applicable for cases without hands involved like this? The holding wiki says no.

Edit: I just realized that because of the implication, that post was automatically tagged with holding panties

Updated by gzb

A separate issue that I want to bring up is that the pixiv tag in Japanese which is used for presenting removed panties's other names is "パンツであやとり". It basically means "playing cat's cradle with panties" and refers to this specific way of holding the panties like post #11550071 and post #11589340.

The question is if we want to distinguish between this and all the other ways that panties can be presented like post #11496569 and post #11473682?

gzb said in forum #448756:

A separate issue that I want to bring up is that the pixiv tag in Japanese which is used for presenting removed panties's other names is "パンツであやとり". It basically means "playing cat's cradle with panties" and refers to this specific way of holding the panties like post #11550071 and post #11589340.

The question is if we want to distinguish between this and all the other ways that panties can be presented like post #11496569 and post #11473682?

Yes, make a new tag for it.

nonamethanks said in forum #450178:

The question is, can presenting removed panties apply to partially removed panties? What if they're only around one leg, being presented while dangling from an ankle, for example?

Found post #5365972 and post #6414297, tagged as panties around toe. Technically not unworn… but they might as well be. They’re not being worn, as far as I’m concerned.

Anyway, if the second BUR is rejected, we’ll have to deal with the implication chain holding panties -> holding underwear -> holding unworn clothes. Because if holding panties doesn’t mean they have to be unworn, it cannot imply that they’re unworn clothes at the same time.

Edit: also, the two posts I just mentioned might help BUR 3 go through. Because the panties are being presented without being held.

Updated by aster1a

gzb said in forum #448756:

A separate issue that I want to bring up is that the pixiv tag in Japanese which is used for presenting removed panties's other names is "パンツであやとり". It basically means "playing cat's cradle with panties" and refers to this specific way of holding the panties like post #11550071 and post #11589340.

The question is if we want to distinguish between this and all the other ways that panties can be presented like post #11496569 and post #11473682?

I think presenting removed panties was meant to be for that specific way of presenting (and holding) panties at first, then it expanded to other ways. A tag for that would help, and could get implications which the current presenting removed panties is currently too vast for.

1