BUR #61043 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication midna_(imp) -> midna
Yeah, I should have checked for previous threads on the subject (topic #25554) and made this thread before I went through and tagged every single midna post, but order of operations has never been my strong suit. In any case, I bring it up again, because i believe it has merit as a tag, and having it is overall better than not having it.
The big difference is in searching. Suppose you wanted to search for imp Midna. That is, see all posts with imp Midna, without any regard for whether or not true Midna is also in the post. In order to do this, you would have to search midna (-midna_(true) or dual_persona). It's just ridiculous to require three terms and an understanding of boolean logic to perform a search for a single character. In what universe is this "less maintenance for searchers" than just having a tag for it? Moreover, because it involves three search terms, it's impossible for regular users. I'm all for keeping it simple, but when the "simple" solution requires more thought for the average user than the "complicated" solution, it's not really simpler.
Sure, it would be another tag to think about editing, and that posters have a chance to forget, and that may need to be fixed and gardened periodically, but you could say the same for just about every other tag on this site.