BUR #59335 is pending approval.
deprecate single_low-tied_sidelock
A two-tags search with single sidelock and low-tied sidelocks should have consistent results that cover this tag. I'm not sure if we really need it.
Posted under Tags
BUR #59335 is pending approval.
deprecate single_low-tied_sidelock
A two-tags search with single sidelock and low-tied sidelocks should have consistent results that cover this tag. I'm not sure if we really need it.
BUR #59336 is pending approval.
create implication single_low-tied_sidelock -> single_sidelock
create implication single_low-tied_sidelock -> low-tied_sidelocks
Alternatively, should it stay, then implications should be made.
In this post there is a "single_low-tied_sidelock" but two "sidelocks" (the untied one is tiny)
てはいさ said in forum #439104:
In this post there is a "single_low-tied_sidelock" but two "sidelocks" (the untied one is tiny)
I see that there's a possibility that users will use this tag for "two sidelocks but only one is tied".
And then there's post #10966391 where I wouldn't consider it as low-tied sidelocks at all, since the hair is not tied at the sidelock. Probably that one is a mistag.
Maybe the tag name itself is kinda ambiguous. There are at least 2 cases that the tag can currently be used for. It may be better to have different tags with better tag names.
Low-tied single sidelock would then have to imply single sidelock AND low-tied sidelock.
There's also long single sidelock which is kinda similar but have much more posts.
This also comes with similar implications.
The "2 sidelocks, 1 long/tied" case needs 2 tags search anyway if you want to specifically search for it under this tag naming scheme. Making dedicated tags for this is possible but I can't think of any good name for now.
Really not sure what should be done about this tbh.
