Deprecate mismatched thighhighs/socks since mismatched legwear exists

BUR #58310 is pending approval.

deprecate mismatched_thighhighs
deprecate mismatched_socks

Mismatched thighhighs and mismatched socks seem underused and redundant to mismatched legwear, and implications to thighhighs and socks respectively had never been set up so it leaves those tags missing from some posts (mismatched_thighhighs -thighhighs and mismatched_socks -socks). They can probably be aliased to mismatched legwear after those posts have thighhighs/socks properly added but I didn't want to make an alias my initial proposal.

BUR #58312 is pending approval.

create implication mismatched_socks -> socks
create implication mismatched_thighhighs -> thighhighs

I can't talk about mismatched socks however I have used and have seen Mismatched thighhighs use for some posts and some characters

Alternative for above

edit: removed example, confused with another tag
edit2: imply not alias 😞

BUR #58313 is pending approval.

deprecate mismatched_shoes
deprecate mismatched_boots

Actually, it's basically the same for mismatched shoes and mismatched boots when mismatched footwear exists. I don't think this needs a separate topic so I'll just include it here.

fuzzbawlz said in forum #435409:

BUR #58310 is pending approval.

deprecate mismatched_thighhighs
deprecate mismatched_socks

Mismatched thighhighs and mismatched socks seem underused and redundant to mismatched legwear, and implications to thighhighs and socks respectively had never been set up so it leaves those tags missing from some posts (mismatched_thighhighs -thighhighs and mismatched_socks -socks). They can probably be aliased to mismatched legwear after those posts have thighhighs/socks properly added but I didn't want to make an alias my initial proposal.

I thought precedent would suggest the opposite, that mismatched legwear should be deprecated and the posts moved to the appropriate mismatched_* tags. (one example being argyle legwear).

ggraphy said in forum #435412:

BUR #58312 is pending approval.

create implication mismatched_socks -> socks
create implication mismatched_thighhighs -> thighhighs

I can't talk about mismatched socks however I have used and have seen Mismatched thighhighs use for some posts and some characters (such as Lilith )

Alternative for above

900 posts in mismatched thighhighs are missing the mismatched legwear tag, they need to have mismatched legwear added first or it would become much harder to find them all. And if someone is typing "mismatched" we would probably want to redirect them to what the correct "mismatched_*" tag to use is.

Missingno2024 said in forum #435414:

I thought precedent would suggest the opposite, that mismatched legwear should be deprecated and the posts moved to the appropriate mismatched_* tags. (one example being argyle legwear).

mismatched legwear implies asymmetrical legwear which is also an umbrella that contains uneven legwear, so I don't think anyone wants to create asymmetrical thighhighs/uneven thighhighs/asymmetrical socks/uneven socks tags.

BUR #58329 is pending approval.

create implication mismatched_thighhighs -> mismatched_legwear
create implication mismatched_thighhighs -> thighhighs
create implication mismatched_socks -> mismatched_legwear
create implication mismatched_socks -> socks
create implication mismatched_shoes -> mismatched_footwear
create implication mismatched_shoes -> shoes
create implication mismatched_boots -> mismatched_footwear

Alternate (that I'm against) but I want to gauge if the downvoters would prefer this instead, if we're keeping these tags for some reason?
The only other two options besides this I see would be:

• 1. Do what Missingno2024 said
• Seems like a ton more work, 19k posts in mismatched_legwear would need to be split into mismatched_thighhighs/socks, and would we have those imply asymmetrical_legwear or do we split that tag and uneven_legwear too?
• 2. Do nothing at all

("imply mismatched_boots -> boots" missing because it needs 66 posts)