Posted under Tags
BUR #56723 is pending approval.
create implication pretzel_bikini -> criss-cross_halter
create implication pretzel_bikini -> sling_bikini_top
create implication sling_bikini_top -> halterneck
A pretzel_bikini is structurally a criss-crossed sling_bikini_top, and since both are supported by the neck, they should logically imply halterneck. Does this look solid to you or am I missing any weird exceptions here?
There's a bunch of stuff in this tag that's actually o-ring bikini variations like post #9831855. Are those still pretzel bikini?
nonamethanks said in forum #429083:
There's a bunch of stuff in this tag that's actually o-ring bikini variations like post #9831855. Are those still pretzel bikini?
The issue is whether the X-shape through an O-ring is enough to call it a pretzel_bikini, especially when the straps don't match.
In post #9831855, the top and bottom straps are aesthetically different, which breaks the 'single piece' look of a pretzel. I've found other examples where the straps maintain a continuous aesthetic through the O-ring, which makes a much stronger case for the tag.
Should we only count it as a pretzel when the straps are continuous in style, or does any X-shape with an O-ring count regardless of the bands? post #5849419 post #9873467
Mars49 said in forum #432035:
Should we only count it as a pretzel when the straps are continuous in style, or does any X-shape with an O-ring count regardless of the bands? post #5849419 post #9873467
I don't know. Might be worth considering just renaming pretzel bikini to criss-cross bikini top tbh.
Also the problem with sling bikini top -> halterneck is that:
