imply tire_swing -> unused_tire

BUR #56711 has been rejected.

create implication tire_swing -> unused_tire

this was never voted on in topic #29381

BUR #56712 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication holding_tire -> unused_tire

also throwing this

There's a few overlapped posts under tire_swing unused_tire and a few untagged posts of tire swings on unused_tire swing that need to be fixed if we want to keep them separate.

The bulk update request #56711 (forum #425244) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

trapster77 said in forum #425245:

BUR #56712 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication holding_tire -> unused_tire

also throwing this

There might be posts where someone is changing the wheels of a Formula One car at a pit stop, not sure if we really want to count those as "unused", but I suppose the idea of this is for tires that aren't on a vehicle...

But then again if we apply that argument then tire swing also makes sense as an implication. @GreyOmega @zetsubousensei what's the rationale for the downvote?

The bulk update request #56712 (forum #425245) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Rational from me was that the tire is still "used" in the case of being on a tire_swing and I thought the point of "unused_tire" was that is was for detatched tires which weren't covered by other tags.

My view aligns with zetsubousensei's for tire_swing.

I guess I do question what is and isn't an "unused" tired though, as tires are used for purposes such as safety barriers (like on race tracks) and bumpers (docks and boats, especially tugboats) where they might seem "unused" but are there for a very explicit purpose.