Two-sided_* implication

BUR #54409 has been rejected.

create implication two-sided_gloves -> gloves
create implication two-sided_gloves -> two-sided_fabric

Missing implications.

Not sure if I can agree with the second implication. The wiki page for two-sided gloves describes them as:

Gloves made with two-sided fabric. The palm is a different color and/or pattern than the outer one.

But I feel like there's a discrepancy between the two sentences in how they define what "two-sided gloves" are. The way I see it, the "sides" are defined differently for fabric and for gloves. While the two sides of a piece of fabric are obvious (front and back), the sides of a glove refer to the palm and the back of the hand, and both of them can still be made from the same side of a fabric.
For a pair of gloves to truly be "made with two-sided fabric" as the first sentence describes, they would be like those winter gloves with linings underneath, rather than what the second sentence suggests, or what most of the posts with this tag fall under.
So while they're related concepts, I don't believe "two-sided gloves" is a subset of "two-sided fabric" and because of that, it shouldn't implicate the latter.

The bulk update request #54409 (forum #416879) has been rejected by @LuxuryRay.

BUR #55127 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication two-sided_gloves -> gloves

Removed the two-sided fabric implication from BUR #54409. If anyone has suggestions for improving the two-sided gloves tag name or wiki, share them on topic #34904.

Yeah the problem is that two-sided fabric is for inner vs outer fabric, like a skirt with a different interior color. two-sided gloves instead is for the top and bottom being of different colors, not the inside vs outside.

The bulk update request #55127 (forum #419565) has been approved by @nonamethanks.