BUR #53337 has been rejected.
create implication yellow_raincoat -> yellow_coat
Everything in yellow_raincoat is naturally a yellow_coat by extension.
Posted under Tags
BUR #53337 has been rejected.
create implication yellow_raincoat -> yellow_coat
Everything in yellow_raincoat is naturally a yellow_coat by extension.
BUR #53338 has been rejected.
create implication raincoat -> coat
This seems to be a missing implication, unless there's some reason why it shouldn't exist.
Looks like last few times it was brought up were forum #168643 and forum #255763 where the argument is that since they have a different function and weight than most coats they shouldn't be implied. I disagree with this, most of our coat vs. jacket tags are tagged based on length as per the coat wiki, and we have winter coat as a separate tag for what most people stereotypically associate with coats.
I also almost typed up a paragraph in the opening post, which I cut for being too autistic, about how a non-zero amount of posts in yellow raincoat aren't actually raincoats because they aren't made out of nylon or other rubbery materials (post #126000 post #7519325 post #9067995 post #8539825). I decided it didn't matter since they were stylized to look like stereotypical raincoats, but if the distinction is that they aren't "Coat-like" enough I guess I'll throw this back out there. It's hard to judge material in art, liberties are taken, I'd still want to see these in a coat search just as much as I'd want to see military coats and other subsets (not lab coat though).
Edit: I was going to play devil's advocate against myself and say that perhaps they shouldn't be implied because of see-through_raincoat but see-through_coat exists, looks almost indistinguishable, and implies coat so... 
Updated by zetsubousensei
There does also exist rain ponchos as well. The average user appears to regularly tag those as raincoats, including using the color raincoat tags for those. If rain ponchos should also be tagged raincoat, then I'd be opposed to having the raincoat tag implicate the coat tag.
GreyOmega said:
There does also exist rain ponchos as well. The average user appears to regularly tag those as raincoats, including using the color raincoat tags for those. If rain ponchos should also be tagged raincoat, then I'd be opposed to having the raincoat tag implicate the coat tag.
Based on the final line of the raincoat wiki they seem to be exclusive with each other? I dont mind doing the clean-up if I'm reading it right.
It also looks like there are several raincoats in the poncho tag, how annoying.
Cleaned up raincoat and rain poncho there weren't too many mistags, mainly because rain_poncho is rare compared to raincoat, but there are a few raincoat no_humans where I wasn't sure if they should be moved to rain_poncho or something else. post #3474157 as an example so I left them alone.
This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.
This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.
The bulk update request #53337 (forum #413100) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.
The bulk update request #53338 (forum #413102) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.