If we want to throw Pinterest and Huaban into the mix (probably the best solution in my opinion), wouldn't that require a different tag name? Last I checked, Pinterest and Huaban are not imageboards, so it'd be weird to have them in the tag too.
Posted under Tags
Damian0358 said in forum #425871:
You'd think that, but I don't think bacon was thorough in his inclusion of e621 first-party sources. There's only 42 such posts currently in the favgroup, yet (assuming the tagging is proper) source:*e621* -third-party_source -second-party_source -artist_request -source_request has nearly 700 posts by itself. And currently it lacks posts sourced from Gelbooru, Paheal, et al.
There's a chance for the tag to get up to 2k posts, at least, without even considering Pinterest or Huaban.
Done. Pinterest and Huaban isn't familiar enough for me to rummage through. I did a bit of Gelbooru and Paheal too.
For the time being, I think e621 and rule34.xxx are enough to warrant creation of the tag.
The bulk update request #56873 (forum #425749) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
my first instinct was to say no, we have tags for those already, but on second thought i could see a named drawfag posting on a board (see: source:*4chan*/*/thread/* -drawfag arttags:1.. -third-party_source) as a justification for including *chans in the tag, as it gets increasingly difficult to search for at that point. can't just tell people to search drawfag or anonymous_(japanese) instead.
I feel as though we should keep booru-style imageboards and chan-style imageboards distinct too, just because they're different in nature, but then that necessitates a rename of the tag for clarity. Like imagebooru first-party source.
I actually asked the other day if Pinterest could be included in the Discord and came here to ask about it, only to find others having already brought it up.
For Danbooru purposes, Pinterest is so much closer to imageboards than other social media sites that I don't think it technically not being an imageboard should matter, given it's still predominantly a repository of (often lower-quality) reposts with very few cases of first-party uploads.
I know that personally when I see a Pinterest source in the queue I usually assume it's a third-party source.
I'd be willing to garden it if no one has any issues. There's usually contextual clues that can be used to determine first-party sources from Pinterest - such as the presence of artist commentary or hashtags like #myart or #digitalart, or the artist entry having a Pinterest account linked to it.
Confetto said in forum #436516:
For Danbooru purposes, Pinterest is so much closer to imageboards than other social media sites that I don't think it technically not being an imageboard should matter, given it's still predominantly a repository of (often lower-quality) reposts with very few cases of first-party uploads.
I personally think it does. The ways Pinterest and Huaban are used is closer to Know Your Meme than it is to Danbooru.
Damian0358 said in forum #436523:
I personally think it does. The ways Pinterest and Huaban are used is closer to Know Your Meme than it is to Danbooru.
I'm not comparing it to Danbooru specifically, I'm saying that it is closer to the way Rule 34 and Paheal are used as sources.
I'd honestly probably include KYM in that same category were it not for the fact that I highly doubt there's any first-party KYM sources hanging around.
I'm not sure it'd be beneficial to make a separate tag for Pinterest/Huaban first-party sources, and I'm not sure what other names could work if we wanted to rename the tag... Maybe "unusual_first-party_source" or something, if we really think the name matters? I just find it kind of a pedantic separation when the tag is meant to say "this is a first-party source from a site that is usually not".