Posted under Tags
BUR #49499 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication high_side_ponytail -> side_ponytail
create implication low_side_ponytail -> side_ponytail
create implication short_side_ponytail -> side_ponytail
Types of side ponytails.
Editing to add: high ponytail, low ponytail and short ponytail all imply ponytail. I think it makes sense for the same to be of the side ponytail counterparts.
Updated by pistachioworm
BUR #49500 has been rejected.
create implication split_ponytail -> ponytail
create implication wide_ponytail -> ponytail
Types of ponytails.
pistachioworm said:
BUR #49500 has been rejected.
create implication split_ponytail -> ponytail
create implication wide_ponytail -> ponytailTypes of ponytails.
Sometimes wide ponytail and split ponytail don't resemble a ponytail at all. For instance, if I search a goated tag like ponytail I don't want to see a hairstyle like this tamamo_no_mae_(fate) split_ponytail or this cure_peace wide_ponytail.
Both of these tags often give a very different look to a regular ponytail. Creating an implication would pollute ponytail.
Maiguel said:
Sometimes wide ponytail and split ponytail don't resemble a ponytail at all. For instance, if I search a goated tag like ponytail I don't want to see a hairstyle like this tamamo_no_mae_(fate) split_ponytail or this cure_peace wide_ponytail.
Both of these tags often give a very different look to a regular ponytail. Creating an implication would pollute ponytail.
I mainly made this implication since I noticed there were a lot of posts in both tags that aren't tagged with ponytail, but probably should be. However, I think you're right that it'd be better to tag it on a case-by-case basis, especially for split_ponytail.
The bulk update request #49500 (forum #394002) has been rejected by @pistachioworm.
The bulk update request #49499 (forum #394001) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #49499 (forum #394001) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
