Knowledge_Seeker said:
As it stands, I don't see why perversion of canon shouldn't then logically imply canon. Unless you really don't want porn in your canon search I guess? is:sfw is right there...
I don't know about implying one to the other, but technically speaking, I'd assume that canon would also imply to pornographic content too. In fact, checking pool:13629 is:nsfw reveals as much, whether it be Bulma accidentally flashing Roshi in Dragon Ball, or canonical depictions of sex (I'm assuming these are referencing something that happened off-screen, which falls under the pool's 'indirectly' rule).
