zetsubousensei said:
Should these really be used on furry or no humans posts? Dog is particularly bad about having stuff like post #9598041 and post #7784037 in it.
I vote alias with the exception of pig nose which seems distinct. The rest feels like canon-tagging with no real meaningful difference. post #9250340, post #4720800, post #1092672, and post #4760016 are all the same style of nose the only difference being the species the character is supposed to be.
I will say that I really don't like it on no humans. There's no reason to be tagging animal nose on an actual animal.
I'm a lot less bothered by it on furry art - furry makes up a significant portion of the tag and I often use an animal nose as a particular factor in judging if something should be tagged as such - not always, to be clear, but often when a character is given an animal nose it tends to bump their appearance further from "human with animal ears" and closer to furry: post #9897649, post #9883866, post #9775509 for some examples of what I mean. Non-furry animal noses are generally the exceptions, as the presence of a (real) animal nose tends to go hand-in-hand with a more animalistic facial structure, whereas the exceptions are things like post #608566 or post #203257 where the face is still otherwise humanoid, often with a human nose bridge or extra ears.
