BUR #40070 is pending approval.
create implication grieve-tan -> general_grievous
Fan made version of him as an anime girl
Posted under Tags
BUR #40070 is pending approval.
create implication grieve-tan -> general_grievous
Fan made version of him as an anime girl
TKX said:
@Witch-Hunter-Siegfried Bowsette is not implied to Bowser because it is a fan-made imagination of a character, so I see no reason to support this.
Also, for fuck's sake, stop making up new tags when you don't know which characters you're tagging.
I didn’t make the fucking tag, I was editing the Sword in the Stone wiki and found it.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
I didn’t make the fucking tag, I was editing the Sword in the Stone wiki and found it.
Yes but why you're making up arthur pendragon (romano-british) or alternate potrayals when the equivalent tag exists?
TKX said:
Yes but why you're making up arthur pendragon (romano-british) or alternate potrayals when the equivalent tag exists?
re: alternate potrayals - topic #31541 should be portrayals
(Seems like some of this should be kept to DMs.)
TKX said:
Yes but why you're making up arthur pendragon (romano-british) or alternate potrayals when the equivalent tag exists?
Romano British Arrthur tag doesn't exist, it's not Myth it's different obviously fucking so, as for alternate potrayals no one fucking told me what stupid ass fucking tag it was.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
...as for alternate potrayals no one fucking told me what stupid ass fucking tag it was.
@zetsubousensei did: forum #347604
Maybe it's because I've been in "working around kids" mode, but y'all could maybe cool it a bit on the language.
Ylimegirl said:
@zetsubousensei did: forum #347604
Maybe it's because I've been in "working around kids" mode, but y'all could maybe cool it a bit on the language.
He was bitching at me first, so correct him.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
Romano British Arrthur tag doesn't exist, it's not Myth it's different obviously fucking so
It does not feel substantially different to justify a different tag. Older art of Arthur, which would still be considered mythological (derived from Welsh myth), differs from the later mythological art that's inspired by the Arthurian romance literature that contributed to our modern image of Arthur, and as a result, "Romano-British Arthur" fits into the existing character tag.
Damian0358 said:
It does not feel substantially different to justify a different tag. Older art of Arthur, which would still be considered mythological (derived from Welsh myth), differs from the later mythological art that's inspired by the Arthurian romance literature that contributed to our modern image of Arthur, and as a result, "Romano-British Arthur" fits into the existing character tag.
He looks completely different, Set it as an implication if you want, but he looks totally distinct.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
He looks completely different, Set it as an implication if you want, but he looks totally distinct.
Then you're demanding for the fracturing of King Arthur (Mythology) because Welsh King Arthur looks different from French King Arthur who looks different from Romano-British King Arthur, which seems silly.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
He was bitching at me first, so correct him.
Well, sorry for strong language I guess. I was admittedly pissed on your modus operandi, hence why I say what I said.
Anyways, I still disagree on how you handle tags and stuff, especially in this case which you are trying to apply pedantry over tagging.
Damian0358 said:
Then you're demanding for the fracturing of King Arthur (Mythology) because Welsh King Arthur looks different from French King Arthur who looks different from Romano-British King Arthur, which seems silly.
https://archive.org/details/warhammer-ancient-battles/Ancient%20Battles%20-%20The%20Age%20Of%20Arthur/page/n3/mode/2up I think the WAB book for this period explains it better then I could, so just read that.
TKX said:
Well, sorry for strong language I guess. I was admittedly pissed on your modus operandi, hence why I say what I said.
Anyways, I still disagree on how you handle tags and stuff, especially in this case which you are trying to apply pedantry over tagging.
Fair, I'm just in a bad mood today over unrelated RPG drama lol, hence my own frusteration.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
https://archive.org/details/warhammer-ancient-battles/Ancient%20Battles%20-%20The%20Age%20Of%20Arthur/page/n5/mode/2up I think the WAB book for this period explains it better then I could, so just read that.
That doesn't address my point at all, like, whatsoever. Regardless, this Grieve-tan thread isn't an appropriate place to have this debate. A thread should be made on the state of the King Arthur (Mythology) tag so that you can express your grievances that Welsh Arthur, High Medieval French Arthur, and Romano-British Arthur are all sharing the same tag (which everyone but you seems to believe is fine).
Wow, so much fighting. Can we keep the forum civil and productive?
Bowsette was already brought up, Kyonko would be another example, if we have a tag for him as an anime girl they shouldn't be tagged with the main character tag for Grievous just Grieve-tan
Ylimegirl said:
@zetsubousensei did: forum #347604
Maybe it's because I've been in "working around kids" mode, but y'all could maybe cool it a bit on the language.
I do think that tag was made before the forum post, but yes let's move the discussion of King Arthur and portrayals over there, and not hurl insults!
zetsubousensei said:
Wow, so much fighting. Can we keep the forum civil and productive?
Bowsette was already brought up, Kyonko would be another example, if we have a tag for him as an anime girl they shouldn't be tagged with the main character tag for Grievous just Grieve-tan
I do think that tag was made before the forum post, but yes let's move the discussion of King Arthur and portrayals over there, and not hurl insults!
TLDR said thread gave me no conclusive answer so was continuing to use the tag I made.