Should kneepit_sex and armpit_sex imply frottage?

BUR #23359 has been rejected.

create implication kneepit_sex -> frottage
create implication armpit_sex -> frottage

If not, the frottage wiki should be updated to exclude them in the definition.
I'd include thigh_sex too but it commonly involves genital contact, in which case it might not count as frottage anymore. That might need to be disambiguated in the wiki as well just in case.

Our usage of frottage as a word is very strange. When I hear "frottage" I immediately think of, well, (nonpenetrative) genital-on-genital contact, usually in form of rubbing two dicks together. I'm meh-ing this BUR because our definition of frottage is weird; I do think kneepit/armpit sex do probably fall under this definition.

[deleted]

Frottage has been in need of a fix for years now but I’m too tired of opening that can of worms again.

At this point I think it should just be implied to all the different sex acts instead of whatever it is now.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #23359 (forum #269004) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

frottage is one of those tags where oldbooru decided they knew better than everyone else, so now that stupid definition is ignored by everyone and you have things like post #7396103 or post #7362288 in there despite the wiki explicitly saying it should not be used on those cases.

As usual, when a wiki goes against common sense, then the wiki is wrong. Feel free to open a topic to restructure this tag if you want.