Missing Fate/Grand Order Implications

BUR #22768 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication jack_the_ripper_(memory_of_qualia)_(fate) -> jack_the_ripper_(fate/apocrypha)
create implication nursery_rhyme_(memory_of_qualia)_(fate) -> nursery_rhyme_(fate)

Found a couple missing Fate/Grand Order implications. So here we go.

There are more ascension and outfit tags missing implications. I can add them here if it's ok, because many characters could have around 10 implications.

EDIT: Sorry, I meant if it was ok with the admins. Most of the tags were created by Benit years ago and I didn't remember why requests weren't made. After searching a bit, I think it was because there were too many tags (forum #210741). topic #21060 got auto rejected but I wouldn't make requests that way, I'd suggest artoria_caster_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> artoria_caster_(fate), for example.

I figured as much. However, as the Fate tags hurt my head to look at for too long (not to mention I'm not interested in the series enough to actually go down and find all of the missing ones), I'd much rather hand that off to someone who is interested enough in this series to do so. Because my goodness, 10 is a lot. These are just a couple I found and looked painless to submit a request for. Please go ahead and use this thread for any more you got. As Fate/Grand Order is rather big, to put it mildly.

BUR #22771 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

To test the waters: Kiara and Kama ascensions, alternate forms and costumes. I'm not sure if kama_(event_portrait)_(fate) should imply OG Kama or Avenger Kama, the craft essence officially portrays the Avenger version (from FGO issues, 7/30 18:00修正).

The bulk update request #22771 (forum #266672) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #22768 (forum #266650) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #23036 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Alright I'll keep doing this, slowly. 4 of Musashi's outfits, 3 of Musashi Zerker's ascensions, and 3 of Artoria swimsuit alter's ascensions. Like the previous BUR, miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) portrays Musashi's Berserker version, but I'm suggesting to implicate miyamoto_musashi_(fate) instead.

EDIT: For the record, I'll try to leave ascension tags created and populated by other users out, like miyamoto_musashi_(first_ascension)_(fate).

The bulk update request #23036 (forum #267754) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Sessyoin_Kiara said:
miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) portrays Musashi's Berserker version, but I'm suggesting to implicate miyamoto_musashi_(fate) instead.

I expressed my annoyance at this a while ago on discord. We keep subskin tags separated and implicated to the main character tag instead of the main skin tag, but this means someone that wants to search for all forms of a specific skin has to search for 4 or 5 different tags.

BUR #23709 has been rejected.

remove implication miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)
create implication miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate)
remove implication kama_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> kama_(fate)
create implication kama_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> kama_(swimsuit_avenger)_(fate)
remove implication astolfo_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> astolfo_(fate)
create implication astolfo_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> astolfo_(saber)_(fate)

I wasn't aware, I'm not on Discord. Craft Essences rarely mention what characters are portrayed though, I couldn't say for sure that kama_(event_portrait)_(fate) was the Avenger version without the official news linked above and the shop notice. I didn't get them in the Japanese server and I hate using Fandom as a source, but I trust the CEs in question are simply named 英霊催装：カーマ and 英霊夢装：新免武蔵守藤原玄信 (historical alias) after you get them.

It's hard to know if people would search for the swimsuit versions looking for the CE outfit, but I don't have objections.

BUR #24309 has been rejected.

remove implication sessyoin_kiara_(lily) -> sessyoin_kiara
create implication sessyoin_kiara_(lily) -> sessyoin_kiara_(swimsuit_mooncancer)

Since she's a version of the Moon Cancer and we started doing implications like this.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #23709 (forum #270492) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Was this missed because of the topic that 1upped this one? I shared my thoughts to clarify my previous proposals and to say that I'm indifferent, I'd like to know the stance for future requests.

EDIT: OK, I'll try to take that into account in the future.

The main problem is whether a character has "different enough" skins to need a flat list of implications vs a tree of subskins. My original annoyance was with Saber vs Saber Lancer vs Saber Alter vs Saber Lancer Alter, but in this case it doesn't really look like it's the same thing.

For ascension tags, if we don't imply them to the base skin tag we'll have essentially two duplicate tags for each image, but for tags like these that seem tangentially related I'm not sure there's any point to do this level of nesting.

Same with Kiara Lily: she's not visually closer to sessyoin kiara (swimsuit mooncancer) any more than she is to sessyoin kiara, right?

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #24309 (forum #272779) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.