Fire Emblem implications

Posted under Tags

BUR #48346 has been approved by @evazion.

remove implication male_byleth_(enlightened_one)_(fire_emblem) -> male_byleth_(awakened)_(fire_emblem)
remove implication female_byleth_(enlightened_one)_(fire_emblem) -> female_byleth_(awakened)_(fire_emblem)
create implication male_byleth_(enlightened_one)_(fire_emblem) -> male_byleth_(fire_emblem)
create implication female_byleth_(enlightened_one)_(fire_emblem) -> female_byleth_(fire_emblem)
mass update id:10016976,10016977,9876825 -> -female_byleth_(awakened)_(fire_emblem)
mass update id:5287476 -> -male_byleth_(awakened)_(fire_emblem)

The Enlightened One costume tags need to be re-implied to their respective original character tags as some posts have them without their post-awakening hair color.

BUR #48754 has been rejected.

rename male_alear_(divine_dragon)_(fire_emblem) -> male_alear_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)
rename female_alear_(divine_dragon)_(fire_emblem) -> female_alear_(emblem)_(fire_emblem)

The all-blue version of Alear actually belongs to the Emblem version of them. The Divine Dragon costume also exists in Fire Emblem Heroes under different names for both genders. I will make a separate BUR for that.

References

Do we need the Engage "emblem" chartags at all? They're just the 'default' appearances of the characters.

They're tagged on characters with a blue glow, the Evil Red Versions of the characters, and entirely identical looking characters that happen to be in Engage-related art. It seems like any of this could be easily searched for with a general tag or copyright tag.

1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 30