Posted under General
Provence said:
I think if we are to detect even ai-assisted art, it's better to just flag it.
Some will go undetected, but at least we can say we try to fight that "content".
If you are suggesting flagging all ai-assisted art that has passed the queue, I highly recommend you reread forum #269002.
Really obvious AI coloring in pixiv #115682088 for example, and hair doesn't make sense in most posts. I'm thinking it's heavily assisted at best.
cyrilkhan said:
If you are suggesting flagging all ai-assisted art that has passed the queue, I highly recommend you reread forum #269002.
Don't worry. The bar for low quality is much higher there.
Not like anyone's gonna flag this stuff anyways.
Why was post #7230550 manually deleted and undeleted? Her pinky literally wraps around from the other side of her hair. I can't flag it because the deletion prevents me from doing so.
Flag without a tag.
ion288 said:
Flag without a tag.
I mean, the "IA" in "IAJEMMA" is AI in French (where they come from), so they definitely use AI in certain degree, including that post you linked which is a "collab" with prixmal, a known AI prompter.
Jemnite said:
Why was post #7230550 manually deleted and undeleted? Her pinky literally wraps around from the other side of her hair. I can't flag it because the deletion prevents me from doing so.
Hi, I uploaded this what's wrong with the pinky being behind the hair? Isn't her hair in between the two fingers?
It doesn't look extremely weird to me but honestly I'm pretty bad at detecting AI :D
I'm pretty new so not exactly sure what the rules are, I guess only high quality "AI-assisted" with no mistakes are allowed?
Is post #7240666 AI-generated? At a glance it seems human-made, but there are also many artifacts that look like something SD would generate. I highlighted potential artifacts with red boxes, you can see here. Akane also has two left feet.
This artist's other artwork also seems a bit suspicious. For example in post #7239995 Asuna's choker/collar/whatever is simply not continuous; and in post #7241022 the shadow in the background (top-left corner) has a weird meaningless crook.
What do you think?
habil_b said:
Is post #7240666 AI-generated? At a glance it seems human-made, but there are also many artifacts that look like something SD would generate. I highlighted potential artifacts with red boxes, you can see here. Akane also has two left feet.
This artist's other artwork also seems a bit suspicious. For example in post #7239995 Asuna's choker/collar/whatever is simply not continuous; and in post #7241022 the shadow in the background (top-left corner) has a weird meaningless crook.
What do you think?
Agreed with all the points you pointed out. In addition, the handlebars in post #7241022 are both weirdly asymmetrical and shaded in a way that makes absolutely no sense.
shark_lj I can't see any ai fuckery in these images. leading me to believe they are assisted to whatever degree.
Allowing ai images to pass the que if they "look good enough to pass" is going to be a minefield for approvers. where, even if it looks good, if it gets flagged or it's pending, no one is going to be willing to touch it if there's even a slight suspicion.
Dannk said:
shark_lj I can't see any ai fuckery in these images. leading me to believe they are assisted to whatever degree.
Allowing ai images to pass the que if they "look good enough to pass" is going to be a minefield for approvers. where, even if it looks good, if it gets flagged or it's pending, no one is going to be willing to touch it if there's even a slight suspicion.
It's no minefield when approvers choose to not approve that stuff.
Dannk said:
shark_lj I can't see any ai fuckery in these images. leading me to believe they are assisted to whatever degree.
Allowing ai images to pass the que if they "look good enough to pass" is going to be a minefield for approvers. where, even if it looks good, if it gets flagged or it's pending, no one is going to be willing to touch it if there's even a slight suspicion.
It's hard to see at a glance, but the artifacts are still there
https://files.catbox.moe/m2b6wn.jpg
Eurekaaaaaa said:
It's hard to see at a glance, but the artifacts are still there
https://files.catbox.moe/m2b6wn.jpg
Aside form those things you pointed out, there's also the recent trend of trying to obscure AI gen through heavy film grain, and these images look like a prime example of that.
Agreed, it's hiding. At least it's pretty easy to look past once you get used to it, so you can treat it the same as those raw outputs like post #7216175
Is post #7094814 reaaally AI-generated? My arguments against it:
- The border separating the white background has a very clear brush texture, and does not overstep onto the hair
- There is a consistent lighting direction
- The way her hair casts shadow on her forehead and near the left collarbone looks very intentional. From my experience, SD is pretty bad at replicating somewhat non-local effects like this
- The towel parting near the right thigh is a very small but very well-structured detail - something that SD almost always fucks up
- The shading in some places (right breast, left elbow) has noticeable banding, which is something that naturally happens when you paint the shadow in several passes. SD would just make it a smooth shadow.
- The big hair strand covers the X-shaped hairpin, and yet doesn't seem to cause any continuity issues at all.
habil_b said:
Is post #7094814 reaaally AI-generated? My arguments against it:
- The border separating the white background has a very clear brush texture, and does not overstep onto the hair
- There is a consistent lighting direction
- The way her hair casts shadow on her forehead and near the left collarbone looks very intentional. From my experience, SD is pretty bad at replicating somewhat non-local effects like this
- The towel parting near the right thigh is a very small but very well-structured detail - something that SD almost always fucks up
- The shading in some places (right breast, left elbow) has noticeable banding, which is something that naturally happens when you paint the shadow in several passes. SD would just make it a smooth shadow.
- The big hair strand covers the X-shaped hairpin, and yet doesn't seem to cause any continuity issues at all.
It's NovelAI V3, not SD. You start getting used to them after seeing them quite a bit
https://twitter.com/Dreadnought_10/status/1746108763780837591
https://twitter.com/rusiorion/status/1746442833769456117
And the way he try to guilt-trips people who called him out on the original tweet instead of trying to prove it makes it even more suspicious
https://twitter.com/3goruken/status/1746306991906283853
Updated by Eurekaaaaaa
I wanted to upload this image, but I'm not sure, if this vtuber is an artist or uses AI, can I get a second opinion on this one?
https://twitter.com/saku_mitsuki_39/status/1760148242992636068
Satan-Sama said:
I wanted to upload this image, but I'm not sure, if this vtuber is an artist or uses AI, can I get a second opinion on this one?
https://twitter.com/saku_mitsuki_39/status/1760148242992636068
Either AI or a really unlucky artstyle (which does happen), but I'd definitely lean towards the former.
