AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Would it be possible to get another check on Araneesama? Lots of their images have visual inconsistencies that read as AI-assisted.

post #10383585 (design inconsistency between the left and right side of the bra)
post #10258162 (inconsistencies in the belt design, right hand claws are placed inside fingers rather than between them)
post #10201091 (belt design is a two-hole style but has no latch and appears to have a buckle instead)
post #9779779 (severe design inconsistency between left and right side of bralette, left side of bralette doesn't stay in bounds of design)
post #9706734 (bottom of sweater doesn't attach to hem correctly)
post #9444082 (belt lacks function, fishnet design reads as suspicious)
post #9080783 (strange towel fold)
post #7963629 (another belt that literally doesn't work)
post #7734224 (lingerie has artifacts)
post #9007256 (tattoo lines broken at strange intervals)

There's more but I'm stopping here for the night. Sorry for the sheer amount here, I've been bent over my screen looking at boobs to the point that I'm feeling a little insane.

ls1547 said in forum #418480:

fuyoko

One of their works on Pixiv is tagged as AI-generated https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/119585813

Thoughts on if the rest of their work is also AI?

The proportions are often a bit off (face post #10791950, hand post #6676953) and some images use the same kind of fuzzy outlines like the tagged image. Except that the outlines are often overdrawn, with the original outlines leaking through.

Not sure if this are the remains of the original sketch or the AI generated template. At least the coloring seams to be hand made. I'm not fully convinced that this is AI, but the quality is all over the place.

pistachioworm said in forum #408242:

too big to quote

RE: asanagi shion

I have suspected their works were AI. They have very suspect colouring but their lineart seems legit. (I have seen artists who actually do this). The thing that is throwing me off is seeing how much drawings they post and how all the ones I've seen are always posted 3 days apart.

I think I just uploaded AI by accident (post #10808505), but I'm not 100% sure. I'm seeing a lot of conflicting information.

Placeholder1996 said in forum #418894:

I'm not sure if that's assisted or generated; I do see some melty areas (for example, the tag on the jar), but they don't seem as widespread as the post you posted.

The Gwar one has some odd details, compare it to the actual design post #4237573. The shoes are completely wrong, the x on the middle hemline is missing, one of the pockets doesn't have the fishbone print, and there's a black line on one of the sleeves that doesn't seem to connect to anything.

I don't see anything human looking on the artist profile and I don't see any reason to assume assisted over generated.

zetsubousensei said in forum #418897:

The Gwar one has some odd details, compare it to the actual design post #4237573. The shoes are completely wrong, the x on the middle hemline is missing, one of the pockets doesn't have the fishbone print, and there's a black line on one of the sleeves that doesn't seem to connect to anything.

I don't see anything human looking on the artist profile and I don't see any reason to assume assisted over generated.

Ok. Flagged.

ANON_TOKYO said in forum #418909:

It doesn't matter how much discussion was had here, someone needs to back up makigirisu's wiki with a good source, otherwise it is a functionally baseless accusation.

Do you mean like a call out thread on Twitter with proof? I remember seeing one a few days after the guy deleted everything. I'll try to find it again