AI-generated art check thread

Zeorynex said:

Need some Checking and opinion on this one
There's some deleted post flagged as Ai and some post are approved from this artist.

artist #291315
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/127772095
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/137106855
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/138008174

Looks like a well-advanced artist, I looked at a lot of his work now, the hair is all without artifacts, which is an indicator of handwork, good work with the 3D background, and the style is uniform from the very beginning.

post #10383204
An other flag without a tag. I'm not seeing any notable artifacts.

ion288 said:

post #10383204
An other flag without a tag. I'm not seeing any notable artifacts.

I see a lot. The shirt has a seam on the right, but it's missing on the left shoulder, there's some kind of artifact under the choker, the eyelashes are completely strange, and there's also some extra part on the sleeve.I still see artifacts on the tie.

spyturbate said:

I see a lot. The shirt has a seam on the right, but it's missing on the left shoulder, there's some kind of artifact under the choker, the eyelashes are completely strange, and there's also some extra part on the sleeve.I still see artifacts on the tie.

I think the thing under the choker is supposed to be her thumb. I agree about the eyelashes and bowtie.

fuminshou_(nekopan_art)
After uploading from them for a year I only just noticed that their earlier works were tagged with ai-assisted. (didn't notice earlier because PISAS and NTISAS only semi-recently added warnings for ai-tagged works, and the artist does not have a wiki entry)
Should the newer artworks also be tagged as such?

It appears artist #396331 is tracing AI-generated images from other accounts.

The strongest evidence I have is post #10389216 is 1:1 with https://x.com/a1llus/status/1849032544165208448 that was posted a year ago. The latter Twitter account openly admits it's AI-generated.

Other pictures seems to also have been traced from other accounts. For example, post #7864429 and post #8046262 seems to be traced from another account. However the only evidence I have is from this account: https://x.com/toretoreAIAI/status/1813942935500857499 and I am unable to independently verify the existence of the original image. artist #396331 seems to deliberately choose images that are relatively old so it's hard to find the original.

I'm very sorry if this is the wrong thread for it.

redberrysdm said:

It appears artist #396331 is tracing AI-generated images from other accounts.

The strongest evidence I have is post #10389216 is 1:1 with https://x.com/a1llus/status/1849032544165208448 that was posted a year ago. The latter Twitter account openly admits it's AI-generated.

Other pictures seems to also have been traced from other accounts. For example, post #7864429 and post #8046262 seems to be traced from another account. However the only evidence I have is from this account: https://x.com/toretoreAIAI/status/1813942935500857499 and I am unable to independently verify the existence of the original image. artist #396331 seems to deliberately choose images that are relatively old so it's hard to find the original.

I'm very sorry if this is the wrong thread for it.

Dont know how credible this is, but just a note. Tracing ai generated is not ai generated on this site. Its considered ai assisted.

Linedrawing man
The skirt here looks weird and there's someone accusing them in Japanese: https://x.com/linedrawing_man/status/1974438570602696720

post #10401223
I couldn't find any evidence of AI. Was the tag added by mistake? Resolution mismatch was also added despite the image being the same resolution as the source, so I think it might be a mistake on the uploader's part.

Blank_User said:

post #10401223
I couldn't find any evidence of AI. Was the tag added by mistake? Resolution mismatch was also added despite the image being the same resolution as the source, so I think it might be a mistake on the uploader's part.

The only other art by that artist tagged ai-generated is post #10259161, which was uploaded by the same user. I personally doubt it’s AI, I also don’t see anything.

How can I add a user to AI assisted instead of full AI generation?

post #10383188
Sus eyelashes, is it enough for a tag?

ion288 said:

post #10383188
Sus eyelashes, is it enough for a tag?

I think it's a prompter. There's post #10383204 (forum #402881), and on post #10383178 the white part of ribbon bleeds below it into an area where the blue shirt should be visible. post #10383163 has melty lines in skirt and shirt; also, the blue shirt bleeds into the yellow ribbon. In post #10383188, one of the lines on the skirt just stops for no reason (asset #38935224). All the posts have suspicious eyelashes.

post #6357352 it is done with copainter AI it seems https://x.com/karube_G/status/1663819212899651584, is it fully generated with repainted sideboob or is it just assisted somehow?

Marlor said:

post #6357352 it is done with copainter AI it seems https://x.com/karube_G/status/1663819212899651584, is it fully generated with repainted sideboob or is it just assisted somehow?

Is there any point in discussing an artist with 13 years of experience?
If I used it, it was just as an experiment and just to see the new technology.

spyturbate said:

Is there any point in discussing an artist with 13 years of experience?
If I used it, it was just as an experiment and just to see the new technology.

I'm talking about this post.
Also there're lots of artists with huge background who have switched into AI.

Marlor said:

post #6357352 it is done with copainter AI it seems https://x.com/karube_G/status/1663819212899651584, is it fully generated with repainted sideboob or is it just assisted somehow?

Comparing the two images side-by-side, this seems like an ai-assisted post. They also fixed the fingers, hair bow, eyes, chopsticks, armpits, and apron; and they added details to the hair. Enough fixes to qualify for assisted, rather than generated. Doesn't mean the rest of their posts are ai-assisted, by the way; this could have been a one-time thing.

asset #38997156, post #9830852

source might be reposter account

fairn said:

Linedrawing man
The skirt here looks weird and there's someone accusing them in Japanese: https://x.com/linedrawing_man/status/1974438570602696720

Agreed, there's a lot of merging lines, bad perspective, non-sensical backgrounds/gibberish, humans simply don't draw lines like that.

post #10408909

Somebody thought this was AI trained on another artist's style, though I'm not too sure if this was the case.