Could use a second opinion on this art and artist.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/138133933
Posted under General
Could use a second opinion on this art and artist.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/138133933
yn said:
What's going to happen with the more obvious ones, like post #6508981? A lot of her earlier art also uses obvious AI backgrounds that probably were just used as is, no tracing involved.
Just the background is still AI-assisted. However, some posts do look more generated than assisted to me. Especially the example shown with the gun in the doc is a big red flag imo.
Spoiledmuffin admitted to resorting to using AI to "pay the bills" on his Discord. Does anyone have a screenshot of this? Is his work going to be labeled as AI now that he's revealed this to his audience?
ai-tracker said:
Spoiledmuffin admitted to resorting to using AI to "pay the bills" on his Discord. Does anyone have a screenshot of this? Is his work going to be labeled as AI now that he's revealed this to his audience?
Proof? You're the one making the accusation here. The burden of evidence is on you here.
flagged as AI but not tagged. I also do not see the pixiv AI tag on it or any kind of indicators it may be generated
czernin said:
flagged as AI but not tagged. I also do not see the pixiv AI tag on it or any kind of indicators it may be generated
It’s already been reapproved, but yeah, that’s human.
post #9661211
Is that document link worth anything in determining if this image is ai-assisted?
post #10355783 (explicit) This got flagged a couple of days ago. I let it go at the time because I thought it was that artist's only post, however since then someone discovered it was another account for aamesawaa, who has no works tagged with ai-generated or ai-assisted. Thoughts? Bad flag, maybe?
Updated by Placeholder1996
ion288 said:
post #9661211
Is that document link worth anything in determining if this image is ai-assisted?
In my opinion, yes.
OK
Next is post #10382639
Please tag or refute.
This is asami's response to the allegations. As the community note points out, she is tracing. Since she can't reproduce her style even to prove her own innocence, maybe all of her art should be tagged with AI-assisted, at the very least? https://x.com/Asamiarts/status/1996604958716690857
would like second opinion on asset #38618841 before i dig around for the original post as this is a reupload. there's a few small issues that I feel can be brushed off as artist error/image just being lowres from reposting
czernin said:
would like second opinion on asset #38618841 before i dig around for the original post as this is a reupload. there's a few small issues that I feel can be brushed off as artist error/image just being lowres from reposting
Oh! I recognize this! Not the source sadly, but it's a redraw of a specific Chinese meme. I know this because I uploaded an image based on one before (post #10332623), which I left the OG source of as a comment (which actually looks pretty wonky)
I don't know if that image as the starter point has any influences, but it does make me think it's human personally. But I think we'd only figure this out if we can track down the OG.
Updated by Knowledge Seeker
i'd like a second opinion to what i've found, artist seems to be using AI in some way, i'd like to say AI-Assisted but some of the mistakes aren't like AI-Assisted works, example being 6 fingers on this art post #10033841, and a character having a white tip on her tail while others don't on a reference art, post #9000465
Also the chibi's leg is really off on this one post #10038657
ayylmaoxd said:
i'd like a second opinion to what i've found, artist seems to be using AI in some way, i'd like to say AI-Assisted but some of the mistakes aren't like AI-Assisted works, example being 6 fingers on this art post #10033841, and a character having a white tip on her tail while others don't on a reference art, post #9000465
Also the chibi's leg is really off on this one post #10038657
None of those things are proof of ai-generation. See: extra_digits age:>4y, bad_leg age:>4y. As for the tail, maybe they felt like doing one differently.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Placeholder1996 said:
None of those things are proof of ai-generation. See: extra_digits age:>4y, bad_leg age:>4y. As for the tail, maybe they felt like doing one differently.
Could be, still a bit suspicious towards the artist's work. Feels off but thank you for the clarification.
Mayhem-Chan said:
There are way too many giveaways, and the two artists you mentionned aren't the only styles getting copied (post #8473740)
Honestly the highly inconsistent yet copied style alone is pretty damning, even more if taken with the context you gave about the twitter account
You're wrong about him coming out of nowhere. He has Pixiv and Newground with works even from 2017, so to say they're completely generated is odd,and he was also doing animations at that time(2018). Maybe with AI now, but definitely not fully gen. Besides, there are a few processes on his, so he definitely knows how to draw at least a little. So i think make mark ai-assisted more correct. And his alot of his last work really looks handdrawn.
Updated by spyturbate
matteste said:
Could use a second opinion on this art and artist.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/138133933
Looks like real. And 1 art from him looks like it was drawn after scanning a traditional pencil drawing.
Need some Checking and opinion on this one
There's some deleted post flagged as Ai and some post are approved from this artist.
artist #291315
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/127772095
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/137106855
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/138008174
Updated by Zeorynex