imply x_anus -> anus

BUR #7138 has been rejected.

create implication x_anus -> anus

Unless we decide that the anus tag is only for more realistic anuses, in which case that should probably be mentioned on its wiki page.

(Also, do star-shaped anuses like in post #2498094 fall under x_anus?)

Somehow I get the feeling that people trying to search for anus aren't looking for this.

As for your question, sure why not?

Yeah, this feels like a poop vs scat situation.

Cattywampus said:

Somehow I get the feeling that people trying to search for anus aren't looking for this.

As for your question, sure why not?

Then should the existing pics tagged with both have the anus tag removed?

Agreed with the above statements + this would block the entire tag of mostly animal and Pokemon posts for safe mode user when only two posts (one of which is deleted) are rated Q/E

HeeroWingZero said:

this would block the entire tag of mostly animal and Pokemon posts for safe mode user when only two posts (one of which is deleted) are rated Q/E

Nah, anus is not in the filtered tags: here's the list.

It's fine if we want the tags to be separate, but in that case we should probably have a ruling on it. About 3 out of 4 pages in the x_anus tag are also tagged with anus, and most of them were only tagged with anus until I went through them. Should I (or someone else) make a note in the anus wiki page that says it's not to be used for x_anus?

The bulk update request #7138 (forum #196317) has been rejected by @TouhouLunatic.

Fixed the wiki and removed the wrongly tagged posts.

nonamethanks said:

Fixed the wiki and removed the wrongly tagged posts.

Thanks so much!