Posted under Tags
BUR #6811 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication book_hug -> object_hug
create implication doll_hug -> object_hug
create implication pillow_hug -> object_hug
They are all object hug, the only inconsistency I can see is that the hugged object can also be an animated object, especially dolls.
Should the wiki changed to say "animate and inanimate objects", or the current way is fine?
BUR #6812 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication wing_hug -> wings
create implication upside-down_book -> book
create implication face_in_pillow -> pillow
Other missing implications I've found while traversing object hug stuff.
pronebone said:
BUR #6812 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication wing_hug -> wings
create implication upside-down_book -> book
create implication face_in_pillow -> pillowOther missing implications I've found while traversing object hug stuff.
I can see an argument being made about drawn wings or something, but if the wings are solid enough to be hugged it won't really matter.
The bulk update request #6812 (forum #194701) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
pronebone said:
BUR #6811 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication book_hug -> object_hug
create implication doll_hug -> object_hug
create implication pillow_hug -> object_hugThey are all object hug, the only inconsistency I can see is that the hugged object can also be an animated object, especially dolls.
Should the wiki changed to say "animate and inanimate objects", or the current way is fine?
I'd say if it's a living doll then it should be tagged hug, otherwise it's an object hug. Hug is for living creatures, object hug is for non-living objects.
The bulk update request #6811 (forum #194700) has been approved by @evazion.
