alias audible_internal_cumshot -> audible_orgasm

BUR #6425 has been rejected.

create alias audible_internal_cumshot -> audible_orgasm

Alternate name: orgasm_with_sound
What i assume is a pet tag. Should it be rather nuked? I personally see value in it, but at present time it's too restricting.

Even if it's a pet tag, trying to broaden it makes no sense. It's obviously a fetish tag. Someone searching for this obviously would not want to see things like solo male ejaculations.

Also, I think it's a hilarious concept so personally I don't mind the tag existing. I can totally see the tag being used or searched for.

nonamethanks said:

Even if it's a pet tag, trying to broaden it makes no sense. It's obviously a fetish tag. Someone searching for this obviously would not want to see things like solo male ejaculations.

It excludes external cumshots (eg. Paizuri or just pulling out), female orgasms, and it can just be fixed with an audible_cumshot creampie search.

"creampie" is not a tag, and not all audible internal cumshots are internal cumshots. post #4660876 for example.

We don't have a single tag for actual creampies in the animated sense so you'd have to search for something unintuitive like audible_orgasm cum_in_pussy, which is just a stupid alternative given all the edge cases.

While I agree with the notion of broadening the tag (especially as I think the tag is absolutely dumb), changing the name to audible_orgasm is equally stupid. If we were to create any more audible_* tags, they'd be ones focused on soundscapes (background noise and the sort, as it can be found in the other two tags), moaning in general (as most of audible speech is dominated by it) and/or one for sex noises (as there's plenty of posts with sound that just include those noises, which would include internal cumshots, and could also include moaning).

So if we were to broaden the tag, it'd either be as audible_sex or audible_sex_noises. Otherwise, given its pet tag nature, I'd personally advocate for it to be nuked.

Damian0358 said:

given its pet tag nature, I'd personally advocate for it to be nuked.

+1

The whole "pet tag = bad" thing only really applies if it's something that will almost certainly never hold value to anyone except to its creator. A good example would be that air pantyshot tag. Just because a tag has mostly been added by one person because they themself want to find that content does not in any way make it a bad tag.

I'm with nonamethanks - leave this tag as is.

+1 to keeping it.

The bulk update request #6425 (forum #192436) has been rejected by @evazion.