[REJECTED] Tag implication: naked_shrug -> shrug_(clothing)

tag implication #9326 naked_shrug -> shrug_(clothing) has been rejected.

Reason:

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication naked_shrug -> shrug_(clothing) (forum #159954) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The tag implication naked_shrug -> shrug_(clothing) (forum #159954) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Bump, seems this was forgotten and left to die.

This is similar to naked sleeves in that a shrug doesn't normally cover the boobs. Normally we don't keep naked_* tags for things that don't cover the breasts and/or crotch, since you can use a nude search instead (in this case, nude shrug_(clothing).

On other hand, we did keep naked cloak and a shrug is kind of similar to a cloak in the level of coverage.

Tagging shrugs with nude doesn't sit well with me. Personal opinion, but when I think of "nude," I think of "bare from the neck to the crotch."

I found post #3255926 within naked_shrug that I definitely would not tag nude.

evazion said:

On other hand, we did keep naked cloak and a shrug is kind of similar to a cloak in the level of coverage.

That's not really a fair comparison. Cloaks are meant to be wrapped around one's body for protection, which isn't even possible with a shrug. A more apt comparison for a cloak would be to a kimono or robe, and nobody's questioning the naked_kimono or naked_robe tags.

IMHO the whole point of naked_<garment> as a concept is that it's supposed to tease the viewer with the possibility of glimpsing an intimate part, whether due to a gust of wind or the garment falling open. With a shrug, that doesn't happen because everything is already uncovered in the first place.

Hillside_Moose said:

I found post #3255926 within naked_shrug that I definitely would not tag nude.

That post is really stretching the definition of "shrug". I would have tagged it as a cropped_jacket instead, because it's just a shortened version of her usual uniform jacket.

Of all the outfits tagged naked_shrug, the only other ones I saw that come close to providing that much coverage are post #3230333 and post #3498178. I don't know what exactly the former is but it's definitely more than just a shrug, and the latter shouldn't count as naked anything since she appears to be wearing a bandeau under it.