Danbooru

[REJECTED] Items removed -> items implications

Posted under Tags

create implication headphones_removed -> headphones
create implication dress_removed -> dress
create implication swimsuit_removed -> swimsuit
create implication necklace_removed -> necklace
create implication necklace_removed -> jewelry_removed
create implication jewelry_removed -> jewelry
create implication shorts_removed -> shorts
create implication pants_removed -> pants
create implication coat_removed -> coat
create implication scarf_removed -> scarf
create implication belt_removed -> belt

Link to request

Various other *_removed tags already imply the corresponding items. necklace implies jewelry so necklace removed implying jewelry removed also makes sense.

Also - should shoes removed, boots removed, sandals removed and slippers removed be implicated to the relevant footwear, or all aliased into footwear removed>

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1440 (forum #141112) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Updated by DanbooruBot

create implication headphones_removed -> headphones
create implication dress_removed -> dress
create implication swimsuit_removed -> swimsuit
create implication necklace_removed -> necklace
create implication necklace_removed -> jewelry_removed
create implication jewelry_removed -> jewelry
create implication shorts_removed -> shorts
create implication pants_removed -> pants
create implication coat_removed -> coat
create implication scarf_removed -> scarf
create implication belt_removed -> belt

Link to request

Resubmitting after automatic rejection.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1645 (forum #146290) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

Updated by DanbooruBot

1