[REJECTED] Tag implication: dojikko -> clumsy

create implication dojikko -> clumsy

Link to implication

"Clumsy character, klutz."

EDIT: The tag implication dojikko -> clumsy has been rejected by @NWF_Renim.

What's the difference between these tags?

I'd go for an alias instead of an implication.

Agreed that this should be an alias. We don't need to preserve two tags that essentially mean the same thing. Dojikko is a bad name for a tag anyway, as it invites users to tag based on outside knowledge (i.e., because a character is canonically a dojikko) rather than tagging what they see.

I'm fine with aliasing dojikko -> clumsy.

There's a few posts that use "dojikko" to refer to absent-mindedness instead, like post #748829. What do we do about those?

feline_lump said:

There's a few posts that use "dojikko" to refer to absent-mindedness instead, like post #748829. What do we do about those?

I was going to suggest oblivious, but it redirects to clueless and its wiki doesn't seem to permit this. Then again, this wiki definition might be too restrictive; we lack a better tag for characters unaware of the situation like in post #1990912.

The tag implication dojikko -> clumsy has been rejected by @NWF_Renim.