๐ŸŽ‰ Happy 19th Birthday to Danbooru! ๐ŸŽ‰
Danbooru

Dear mods / Image Quality Standarts?

Posted under General

Well, like I said: It is a balancing act between flagging a posts, not flagging and screwing off certain users. I honestly think that Qpax is one of our most prolific users, but the Mercy post is probably a not so good image and will most probably be deleted. That doesn't mean that your work is not respected, I think you even received multiple positive feedbacks lately. That should be proof enough that you have excellent uploads which means that even if you receive a flagged post that you shouldn't take the flag to seriously. Just move on. Only if you accumulate to many (succesful) flags, which is simply not the case, then you should rethink your upload habits. I put succesful in brackets, since even an unsuccesful flag is calling out to the Contributor. If it gets approved, then it means that the post is just above the borderline.
So yeah. I think continuing flagging is good, but also flagging should be put to a higher scrutiny. That means a post should be under borderline which means for me that I'd never approve such a post and as an approver, I think I have a good counter-measurement here and post you personally don't like don't fit here orpost that goes with bad_anatomy etc. (I also approve such posts, but then I tag such post with the corresponding tag). Because it is no selfish act, but it's a tool that should help improving Danbooru and uploader habits and if they are too many deleted posts then I think a feedback is appropriate. The same applies for approvers off course: An approvers opinion is not fix and also can be objected via flags.

Not going to lie, I'm a little worried about this. I'm not what you'd call a prolific uploader, and 3 out of my last 4 posts have been flagged.

What's concerning to me isn't so much the flagging, but rather whether I should take it as an indication to just stop? I mean I saw nothing wrong with the images that I uploaded in terms of egregious errors. Are they the greatest pieces of art to ever be contributed to Danbooru? Of course not, but I didn't see anything wrong with them, or anything that I felt was wrong enough to prevent them from being uploaded. Now, admittedly post #2624069 is one of those artstyles that's really hit or miss, but that I've liked enough and felt good enough about to upload.

I have an inherent worry because even take a few moments to really look over an image can result in it being sniped by another user, and sometimes it's hard to tell if something has been left because other people willingly passed over it, or if it's just a lucky break that no one got to it first.

I'd like to think that my own standards of quality haven't suffered or become outdated over the years, but getting three flags in like two days has just freaked me out. I'm not taking it as a personal attack or anything, but I'll admit that it's just been disheartening to me.

Qpax said:

I know I have shitty taste when it comes to assessing the quality of image but I never even noticed those flaws until someone pointed them out me. I am againist the deletion of these kind of images as long as the flaw of the image doesnt really that eye disturbing. For example if the flaw of the image is very noticable as you can see in this post #2619175 (NSFW) then flaggers rather should focus on cleaning these kind of pictures from danbooru rather than focusing on little details people like me can't even notice in the first place. I know that why mods who have better perception than us here for. After flaggers are done with this cleaning job then they can go ahead and try to raise the quality of the site even more by flagging and sending posts like Mercy pic to mod queue for more further assessement (this is just an example by the way we are not assesing the picture quality here). Someone from one of my flagged post pointed out this post #2482184 in his comment for example and until this time no one had friggin' flagged this picture even though the bad anatomy is so noticable and eye disturbing. I find it quite hypocritical for flaggers spending their time on flagging rather little details that won't hurt the overall quality of image than focusing on clearing posts that has more issues like this post #2619175 again anyways.

After the "But there is worse!" argument became more and more popular in the wake of topic #13113, I decided to devote a part of my daily flag contingent to the worst bad quality posts here on Danbooru. I started with the poorly_drawn tag (see forum #119504) and flagged hundreds of posts featuring bad quality art (all of the flagged posts were deleted). I am planning to do the same with bad_proportions, bad_anatomy and bad_perspective sometime in the future. This will not, however, stop me from flagging newly uploaded bad qulaity posts. Sadly I don't have enough time on my hands to check every single upload for extreme cases of bad anatomy or bad perspective, so stuff like post #2482184 or post #2577406 will slip by eventually. :/

Qpax said:

So my suggestion for flaggers that rather than focusing on little details that no one notices unless they are pointed out especially in posts like this one ( post #2615275 I'm using my posts as an example again) they should aim for posts which is more eye disturbing than this one. Arguing little details like her butt cheek looks off so it should be deleted is what makes no sense here even though when you look at the overall quality of image is more dominant than the flaw itself. I mean look at this way. If the flagger havent pointed out her butt cheek then no one even noticed that flaw in the first place since the image quality in overall is good at the very least and that flaw is not even noticable, in this case at least for me. It changes from person to person and as I said I didnt even noticed her butt cheek when I first uploaded the image itself (and still it doesnt bother me).

I wouldn't describe the anatomical error in post #2615275 as minor. It is pretty easy to notice and very hard to unsee. The flag is deserved in my opinion. Please don't take this as a personal insult because it really isn't. It's just a flag. The flag places the corresponding post in the mod queue where multiple approvers can decide on how grave the described issue really is.

Qpax said:

All the effort you poured into finding it and uploading it goes somehow waste.

Based on your upload-delete-ratio you "wasted" 0.7% of your total upload work. That's a pretty small amount. Besides, I don't think that your work is totally wasted, even if a small fraction of your uploads are ultimately deleted. Deleted posts remain on the server an can still be browsed by users who like the metatags status:all and status:deleted. (Yes, I sometimes do browse deleted posts to find stuff that is generally looked down upon.)

Provence said:

Well, like I said: It is a balancing act between flagging a posts, not flagging and screwing off certain users. I honestly think that Qpax is one of our most prolific users, but the Mercy post is probably a not so good image and will most probably be deleted. That doesn't mean that your work is not respected, I think you even received multiple positive feedbacks lately. That should be proof enough that you have excellent uploads which means that even if you receive a flagged post that you shouldn't take the flag to seriously. Just move on. Only if you accumulate to many (succesful) flags, which is simply not the case, then you should rethink your upload habits.

Provence is right. I think you should be more confident in your upload work. You are an excellent uploader with a very small deleted post count. I sincerely appreciate the work done by you and many other uploaders here on Danbooru. Without you people this site would have no content to browse, nothing to tag and in the end consequently ... nothing to flag. :P

Updated

Grahf said:

Not going to lie, I'm a little worried about this. I'm not what you'd call a prolific uploader, and 3 out of my last 4 posts have been flagged.

What's concerning to me isn't so much the flagging, but rather whether I should take it as an indication to just stop? I mean I saw nothing wrong with the images that I uploaded in terms of egregious errors. Are they the greatest pieces of art to ever be contributed to Danbooru? Of course not, but I didn't see anything wrong with them, or anything that I felt was wrong enough to prevent them from being uploaded. Now, admittedly post #2624069 is one of those artstyles that's really hit or miss, but that I've liked enough and felt good enough about to upload.

I have an inherent worry because even take a few moments to really look over an image can result in it being sniped by another user, and sometimes it's hard to tell if something has been left because other people willingly passed over it, or if it's just a lucky break that no one got to it first.

I'd like to think that my own standards of quality haven't suffered or become outdated over the years, but getting three flags in like two days has just freaked me out. I'm not taking it as a personal attack or anything, but I'll admit that it's just been disheartening to me.

I think that getting one of your images flagged is new to you.
Well, I think, because I flagged at least two of your uploads (maybe also the third one, but can't remember that). But the two Idolmaster posts show in my eyes pointed out flaws that are in my eyes not so good to stay "active".
It is like I mentioned above: One should also take the content of a flagged post seriously, because if re-approved, those post are probably just above the borderline. Does this apply to your other posts? No, it doesn't if it stays by those flags (and maybe deletions).
One doesn't need to look over a post for minutes, I decide to flag a post in a pretty short time. But I think I pointed out two times two tiny hands which means that you should probably take a closer look at those things (even if the flags are re-approved).

The flagging system seems to favour flagger by a disproportionate amount.
*edit* Also unfair is how users can only APPEAL 1 post/day, while multiple flags can be created.

One person on multiple accounts can keep flagging an image until the mods give in.

IMHO, a flagged image should NOT be deleted after 3 days; rather, it should be up to reviewer to actively remove the image (by pressing an Unapproved button).

This way would be fairer, and easier to police.

Updated

Kikimaru said:

One person on multiple accounts can keep flagging an image until the mods give in.

That is an issue with sockpuppet accounts that should be dealt with on a case by case basis, not an issue with the flagging system.

Provence said:

Three days are more than enoughThe reports do mention a large amount of "Disapprovals", so those flags do definitely get enough attention. It could be better, but the three days are not the problem.

Then? What is the problem? Tastes?

Grahf said:

Not going to lie, I'm a little worried about this. I'm not what you'd call a prolific uploader, and 3 out of my last 4 posts have been flagged.

What's concerning to me isn't so much the flagging, but rather whether I should take it as an indication to just stop? I mean I saw nothing wrong with the images that I uploaded in terms of egregious errors. Are they the greatest pieces of art to ever be contributed to Danbooru? Of course not, but I didn't see anything wrong with them, or anything that I felt was wrong enough to prevent them from being uploaded. Now, admittedly post #2624069 is one of those artstyles that's really hit or miss, but that I've liked enough and felt good enough about to upload.

I have an inherent worry because even take a few moments to really look over an image can result in it being sniped by another user, and sometimes it's hard to tell if something has been left because other people willingly passed over it, or if it's just a lucky break that no one got to it first.

I'd like to think that my own standards of quality haven't suffered or become outdated over the years, but getting three flags in like two days has just freaked me out. I'm not taking it as a personal attack or anything, but I'll admit that it's just been disheartening to me.

This is honestly the bigger concern here, I think. The current perception is that it's bad to have anything flagged since deletions are perceived as bad in the first place, and are oftentimes the judging rubric for whether one user or another gets positive feedback or positive reception over their uploads. As builders with unlimited ups, we're allowed to skip the queue but at the cost of sometimes large scrutiny over our uploads, yet most of us don't dare to send our posts into the mod queue anyway because we confidently believe some posts can and will fly by.

At a larger degree though, the difference between having a post in the mod queue because you sent it there and having a post in the mod queue because it was flagged is that flags usually mean deletion, and the mod queue usually means grace. Perhaps because potential flaggers would let it fly by assuming no one approves it until after someone does, in which case it has already slipped from their eyes. Of course, there are users that still stare closely at these things cough cough.

So yeah, it is very much a psychological problem like OOZ mentioned in forum #126728. Hence why I don't hold a lot of respect for uploaders (at some points even disdain) that just choose to auto-refresh and monitor their pixiv/seiga feed for uploads to quickly snipe. That goes double if they then exhibit minimal-average tagging effort on them just so they can get their name on it as Rastamepas implied in forum #126722.

OOZ662 said:

Also keep in mind that these "upload bots" being referenced are always going to fall prey to "the candle that burns twice as bright lasts half as long" and that will always be the case regardless of how much effort is put into trying to retain them. Danbooru's a hobby, and while any hobby can be fun to dive full-force into to begin with you're going to either have to pull back eventually or you'll completely burn out. Currently, we don't seem to have anyone filling this role to such an astounding level as users like Mr_GT have in the past, but is that really something to worry about? Do we need users cluttering the place up with every half-acceptable image barely tagged and rarely sourced and edging out the attention that could be spent on more obscure but quality posts from odd copyrights? Does seeing people do that really somehow inspire others to do more themselves? It seemed quite the opposite to me, but I was also much newer to the site back then.

Danbooru isn't dying. If anything, it's retracting and as a result is probably fitting its intended purpose as a quality art gallery more closely as more "grassroots" uploaders appear and less "firehose uploaders" exist. Flagging supports that same dynamic, reminding uploaders that can take the criticism that they should take care in what they're uploading. Unfortunately, many people immediately assume that a flag is the result of someone directly attacking them, their effort, or both instead; I don't see how that can be solved without conflicting with the core moderation feature besides perhaps just making flagging a toggle instead of requiring a reason, which is usually the thing that gets people fighting about it. Even then the response "there's nothing wrong with this picture" will join "I've seen worse" on the top of the Most Used Argument list.

I completely agree with the first paragraph, since I only became an uploader after lurking pixiv for so long I got fed up with artists deleting their own work and hard-to-find quality posts that just weren't shared yet. More than anything though, I appreciate the "grassroots" uploaders a lot more than the "firehose" uploaders, but it sometimes feels like an underappreciated effort as the posts that we usually find don't get the upwards of 25 scores from popular works by popular artists. Combine that with the fact that some users like seeing their names at the top of the user reports when sorting by score... it does feel like a meaningless competition sometimes if not often.

The concern I have at large is if these grassroots uploaders will continue to do what they're doing and if new ones will show up. Maybe flagging isn't just the problem there though.

Mmh.... my brief interruptions of demotivation come whenever I feel too ticked off looking at poorly tagged uploads from particular spam-refresh users, or whenever I get bored/overwhelmed from having too much open.

Luckily I'm semi-fast at tagging (With the frequent tags menu, autocomplete and what not) but I don't think I've ever done 100+ uploads in a single day.

EDIT: Would also like to note that tagging is pretty quick, but searching for good art is what takes time.

I get demotivated everytime a large amount of good posts are sniped from me, which means that it's everyday hahaha. Realistically, every 1-2 weeks.

Personally, I got ticked off everytime I see the works of a certain famous artist that uploaded solely (or at least dominately) by one person and produces a large amount of scores and favorites for each pictures. Sweet Lord of Jesus. Thankfully, now I'm become more as "consumer" rather than "producer" of posts now. Good posts will eventually get uploaded in the end by them anyway.

I think the biggest demotivation I had was my own damn fault. I commissioned an artbook which got posted to e-hentai that someone then fully uploaded onto here. I was kicking my own ass for that hard for about a week or two.

1 2 3 4 5 6