create implication dark_skinned_male -> dark_skin
Dark skinned males have dark skin, right?
Posted under Tags
create implication dark_skinned_male -> dark_skin
Dark skinned males have dark skin, right?
According to the dark skinned male wiki:
Note that, while this tag was created specifically to help distinguish pairing composition in interracial situations, it intentionally does not implicate it. Note also that while dark skin female is aliased to dark skin, this tag is intentionally not.
Seems that the lack of implication is intentional.
dark_skin -dark_skinned_male if you want only dark skinned females.
Blue_Trident said:
Seems that the lack of implication is intentional.
The wording of the wiki appears to mean that dark skinned male doesn't imply interracial and isn't aliased to dark skin. Which is technically true, though it doesn't appear to add much to the wiki besides stating the obvious. But this discussion is about an implication to dark skin, not an alias, so the quoted part of the wiki is irrelevant.
It's pretty clear that this tag is a subset of the broader tag, so the implication is perfectly reasonable.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think majority of dark-skinned males are faceless hentaidudes and not many people will be interested in searching them. Creating this implication will only muddle actual search results with unneeded posts.
Basically, dark_skin only covers females, for similar reasons as to why female tag is not in use.
worldendDominator said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think majority of dark-skinned males are faceless hentaidudes and not many people will be interested in searching them.
We have a faceless male tag too. Presumably, this information is useful to somebody.
Basically, dark_skin only covers females...