Tag implication: applying_makeup -> makeup

create implication applying_makeup -> makeup

Link to implication

OI think that is obvious?

They may not actually be wearing the makeup yet, like in post #15214 .

Yeah, but we see the lipstick tube's content^^.

The present description for the makeup tag states:

Used to denote characters wearing cosmetics on the face.

If it hasn't already been applied, we use the cosmetics tag, not makeup. This makes it possible when searching to distinguish makeup that's being worn from products still in their containers. Note that lipstick tube doesn't imply lipstick.

iridescent_slime said:

The present description for the makeup tag states:

If it hasn't already been applied, we use the cosmetics tag, not makeup. This makes it possible when searching to distinguish makeup that's being worn from products still in their containers. Note that lipstick tube doesn't imply lipstick.

So that this should get changed to imply cosmetics.

The tag implication applying_makeup -> makeup has been rejected.