Posted under Tags
Reasoning: Nipples are a part of breasts, so covering your nipples means you're covering your breasts.
(Honestly, looking at the two tags, they seem to have almost the exact same types of things in them; it's very rare to have someone covering their breasts and not their nipples. So it might make sense to do this as an alias instead. But at the very least the implication seems appropriate.)
Ugh, you're right!
But there's a huge number of pages that need the other tag added; I guess it'll have to be done manually on a case by case basis:
covering_nipples -covering_breasts
covering_breasts -covering_nipples
And while I know it's not an argument for an implication (because others could be added later or there could be ones where they aren't properly tagged), covering_nipples male contains exactly one image.
...actually, I'm not even sure that that's a male. The picture is androgynous, and as I recall the character in question is a flat-chested female for part of the story. Most of the urushibara_ruka pictures seem to have been tagged male or female more or less at random. This is really something for another thread, but is there a policy for when a character has canonical forms for both genders and appears completely androgynous in pictures?
Updated by Xabid
Did you read the wiki?
covering_nipples
Characters using the bare minimum to cover just the nipples, but leaving most of the breast and sometimes areolae exposed (ex. using one or two fingers to cover the nipples instead of the entire hand). Often done in a teasing manner.
The difference between the two tags is one or two fingers, as opposed to the whole hand or arm.
Implication was proposed in topic #8206, but several people disagreed with it, saying the tags are distinct and wanting to avoid dilution.
-1
