Danbooru

How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

user #487300 likes to add yuri or implied_yuri to posts, including quite a few where those tags aren't appropriate, IMO. In particular, they seem to consider any use of the cunnilingus_gesture by a female in posts without a clear hetero context sufficient for implied_yuri, e.g. post #3330675, post #3384249. I'd say that the gesture can imply a desire to have the act performed on oneself just as well as a desire to perform it on another female. What do you think?

This user also adds their favorite tags to posts where the contact seems merely friendly, like post #3386013 and post #3382399, and in one case apparently because the artist calls themselves "yurifucker" (post #3290458).

Updated by DanbooruBot

post #825396 contains no reference to lesbianism (unless you count the rainbow theme, but that's very loose inference), but SSJG (user #422743) insists that it's implied_yuri. They also re-added the tag to post #3384249 and post #3330675, where skylightcrystal (user #557539) had removed it. I still don't think that a cunnilingus_gesture should be implied_yuri by default, but I'd like to get a ruling on the issue here before I remove the tag again.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Flopsy said:

post #825396 contains no reference to lesbianism (unless you count the rainbow theme, but that's very loose inference), but SSJG (user #422743) insists that it's implied_yuri. They also re-added the tag to post #3384249 and post #3330675, where skylightcrystal (user #557539) had removed it. I still don't think that a cunnilingus_gesture should be implied_yuri by default, but I'd like to get a ruling on the issue here before I remove the tag again.

I say this suggests nothing at first. No character is mentioned which looks like a requirement for the implied yuri tag.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Flopsy said:

post #825396 contains no reference to lesbianism (unless you count the rainbow theme, but that's very loose inference), but SSJG (user #422743) insists that it's implied_yuri. They also re-added the tag to post #3384249 and post #3330675, where skylightcrystal (user #557539) had removed it. I still don't think that a cunnilingus_gesture should be implied_yuri by default, but I'd like to get a ruling on the issue here before I remove the tag again.

Mind you, this is the same user that adds the hetero tag to any images where there is a penis having sex with a girl, even when the owner of the penis isn't anything close to humanoid like a pokemon or a dragon. They also kept re-adding the hetero tag to post #3256459 until I Dmailed them about it, it seems like they either don't care about how the tags are used or don't know.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Lacrimosa said:

I say this suggests nothing at first. No character is mentioned which looks like a requirement for the implied yuri tag.

Unbreakable said:

Mind you, this is the same user that adds the hetero tag to any images where there is a penis having sex with a girl, even when the owner of the penis isn't anything close to humanoid like a pokemon or a dragon. They also kept re-adding the hetero tag to post #3256459 until I Dmailed them about it, it seems like they either don't care about how the tags are used or don't know.

Alright, I've re-removed implied_yuri from the cunnilingus_gesture posts I mentioned. SSJG has apparently added implied_yuri to almost all posts with cunnilingus_gesture, but I'll wait for a reaction from them before removing the tag from the other posts.

Could you explain why you think that hetero shouldn't be used on posts that fall under bestiality, Unbreakable? The wiki pages don't mention any such restriction, and there's 84 pages of hetero bestiality. The genders of the participants and whether any of them counts as an "animal" looks like two separate and independent properties to me.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Flopsy said:

Could you explain why you think that hetero shouldn't be used on posts that fall under bestiality, Unbreakable? The wiki pages don't mention any such restriction, and there's 84 pages of hetero bestiality. The genders of the participants and whether any of them counts as an "animal" looks like two separate and independent properties to me.

I'd say the wiki is wrong then, I doubt people searching for hetero would want to see bestiality posts in there, if you want to see both you could just do a hetero bestiality search.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Why wouldn't they want that? If they don't want to see bestiality at all, they should blacklist the tag. You could make the same argument you're making about hetero rape or hetero loli or whatever. There is nothing anywhere on the site indicating that hetero means anything but "a female and a male being getting romantic and/or sexual".

Edit: When you say "do a hetero bestiality search", I presume that you mean ~hetero ~bestiality, i.e. hetero OR bestiality. To clarify, when I write tag_X tag_Y, I'm talking about posts that are tagged with tag_X AND tag_Y, which is what you'll get when you click the link. This doesn't really change what we're saying, but it might make our arguments easier to follow.

Updated by DanbooruBot