How do I tag this?

Ylimegirl said:

Referring to the little bit of definition between her bikini bottom and her navel, yknow the naturally non-flat stomach had by woman in the real world (yes even skinny women) but rarely highlighted in illustrations. So above where the mons is.

pool #3683 exists for more intentional/exaggerated/noticeable examples, but I'm fairly sure there isn't currently any tag or place for when the fat there is defined but not a major feature of the image. The proper name (amidst a sea of colloquialisms with no prime standout) seems to be panniculus, if you wanted to start a tag for it.

[deleted]

post #9188877

Does clothed female nude male count if the female is bottomless and having sex in a clearly submissive position?

Freshblink said:

post #9188877

Does clothed female nude male count if the female is bottomless and having sex in a clearly submissive position?

According to wiki, clothed female nude male can imply femdom, but doesn't have to.
On the other hand, I think tagging it bottomless is wrong, since wiki of that tag explicitly tells not to do that in skirt/dress_lift+nopan situations.

How would I tag grabbing own dress and what's the tag for this (Medea's from Colchis and in this art she's wearing Colchian clothes) post #9210055

Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:

How would I tag grabbing own dress

Grabbing own dress is just skirt hold in this context.

NiceLittleDan said:

Grabbing own dress is just skirt hold in this context.

TY, was wondering about this a few days back and was also editing tags on that upload too.

Historical connection is the right tag I’d wager (Shakespeare wrote Romeo and Julliet) post #9211601

nkuylo said:

On the other hand, I think tagging it bottomless is wrong, since wiki of that tag explicitly tells not to do that in skirt/dress_lift+nopan situations.

This is correct. Bottomless does not apply in these situations.

post #9218265

What do I dooooo? This cheeky artist skirts the line between yuri and futanari with their ambiguous oral!

Can anyone ID the pokemon in post #9210387 ? Can't quite get what it's supposed to be. "Zoroak" might not fit the bill

Siknakaliux said:

Can anyone ID the pokemon in post #9210387 ? Can't quite get what it's supposed to be. "Zoroak" might not fit the bill

It's not a Pokémon, it's just a generic werewolf-esque monster.

AngryZapdos said:

It's not a Pokémon, it's just a generic werewolf-esque monster.

Thanks

post #9214134 post #7848105 post #8018902
Can we make some tags for situations like these where someone is holding something and making gesture with the same hand?
Such as holding_with_v, holding_with_w, holding_with_\n/, holding_with_\m/, etc.
In most of ~v ~\n/ ~w ~\m/ holding solo, the hands holding things and gesturing are different hands.

Is there a tag for holding an object in one hand and gesturing towards it with the other? Like how infomercial hosts will hold an object up and gesture towards it with the other hand across the body with the palm up.

Is there a specific tag I should use for Hans being mostly off "screen" in this art here? post #9231344

Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:

Is there a specific tag I should use for Hans being mostly off "screen" in this art here? post #9231344

he's out of frame

post #9234673

What's the little guy to the left of Sayaka called?

CommentaryRequest said:

post #9234673

What's the little guy to the left of Sayaka called?

Oktavia von Seckendorff

CommentaryRequest said:

post #9234673

What's the little guy to the left of Sayaka called?

Oktavia von Seckendorff, a witch (madoka magica). Her own, specifically, which makes this dual persona also, I believe.