Maybe it's just me, but I find the wiki description ("When scenery with wild plants is clearly visible.") for nature to be unintuitive and contrary to its common definition, i.e., all the things in the physical world that aren't man-made. By the wiki, post #1290730 could bear the tag for its "wild plants" but post #222336 shouldn't, despite its outdoor setting lacking any indication of having been touched by human hands. Other plant-less images bearing the nature tag include post #1139105, post #496461, and post #1578566, and it isn't hard to see why they were tagged that way. As it stands, the tag doesn't correlate to most people's understanding of what the word means.
This could stand to be made a lot more clear. I'm not saying that nature should be aliased to wild plants or anything like that, even if it made the tag's intended use more obvious, but I'm hesitant to drastically amend the wiki entry to better reflect non-Danbooru usage of the word. Any ideas?