Tag Implications to torn_clothes

should imho implicate torn_clothes:
torn_bra
torn_gloves
torn_pants
torn_panties
torn_pantyhose -- already done
torn_shirt
torn_sleeves
torn_swimsuit
torn_skirt
torn_thighhighs -- already done

should stay independend:
torn_jeans
torn_wings
torn_hat

I understand torn wings not being implicated, but why not torn jeans or torn hat?

Given that torn jeans is actually a style of jeans, I think it's kind of wrong to implicate it to torn clothes. torn clothes kind of suggests that the clothing wasn't supposed to be torn, having them torn as a style kind of doesn't fit in too well.

Though then again, someone could always filter that out with a torn_clothes -torn_jeans search, so it wouldn't matter too much if it was implicated.

I think torn_jeans is small enough that it's okay to implicate it. torn_clothes simply says "Clothes that are in a torn state."

Done all except wings. I think hat is okay... it's still clothing, I'd say.

Bumping because these two aren't done (were they undone or something?):
Implicate torn_pantyhose -> torn_clothes
Implicate torn_thighhighs -> torn_clothes

I think the idea was to use torn_clothes + pantyhose and same for thighhighs.

To nip bad tagging in the bud, please implicate torn legwear to torn clothes.

*edit*
Seems to be taken care of.