both are tag as loli but I don't think they reveal enough to warent the loli tag. it just looks like a girl is fanning herself cause its hot and you happen to see some of her panties and stomach.
Posted under General
both are tag as loli but I don't think they reveal enough to warent the loli tag. it just looks like a girl is fanning herself cause its hot and you happen to see some of her panties and stomach.
saizo0070 said: post #1275499
Certainly sexual enough, but not young-looking enough in my opinion, so I'd say no.
Added the tag just in case
Hillside_Moose said:
forum #4987
Same problem being experienced here.
Should post #70251 have shota tag?
saizo0070 said:
post #1291503
Pretty well developed breasts, so I'd say not loli.
Hansen_Sebastian said:
Loli and shota are gender-based tags. Loli refers to a teen female who looks like a child while shota refers to such males.
Do you even read what you type before posting? Honest question here.
Ars said:
Pretty well developed breasts, so I'd say not loli.Do you even read what you type before posting? Honest question here.
Yes. Lolis are for teen human females (say 19 years old) who look a little younger than they are (say 11 years old) and normally have a flat chest (take Shana for example). But this is not the case of shota, where teen males look a little younger (say 12) for their age (say 18), and look more innocent (take Kagamine Len for example).
Hansen_Sebastian said:
Yes. Lolis are for teen human females (say 19 years old) who look a little younger than they are (say 11 years old) and normally have a flat chest (take Shana for example). But this is not the case of shota, where teen males look a little younger (say 12) for their age (say 18), and look more innocent (take Kagamine Len for example).
You could just say you don't know what you're talking about, that would save everyone's time.
Hansen, do you even understand the purpose of this thread? Hint: It isn't "post the definition of loli and shota". Additionally, the definition you give is at odds with Danbooru's policy: any character that appears preadolescent in a sexual situation is either loli or shota. Their canonical age (and how innocent they look) has nothing to do with it.
Hansen's definition is also at odds with the etymology of the terms.
"Loli" (short for "lolicon" = "lolita complex") comes from "Lolita" as in Nabokov's novel about a relationship involving a man and a 12-year-old girl (not 19-year-old). Shota is short for ("shotacon" = "Shoutarou complex") and named for a 10-year-old boy in the manga "Tetsujin 28-gou" (not an 18-year-old).
Interestingly both "Lolita" and "Tetsujin 28-gou" were written at about the same time in 1955-1956.
Added the tag to post #1295710 but wanted a second opinion
Krugger said:
Added the tag to post #1295710 but wanted a second opinion
It's appropriate there, yes.