608 ? girl_in_bucket
486 ? girl_in_food
391 ? girl_in_a_box
183 ? girl_in_a_cup
56 ? girl_in_a_bottle
21 ? girl_in_refrigerator
20 ? loli_in_a_bag
The other related tags aren't big enough or have wiki pages.
Again, just for consistency. Following in_container and the biggest two tags above, I guess that'd be at least X_in_a_Y -> X_in_Y. At the very least give each X_in_a_Y / X_in_Y pair an alias in one direction or another.
There's also forum #23743, forum #58510, and forum #63647 (among others?), in which aliasing to in_Y (following in_bowl and in_container) was brought up.
------
NWF_Renim said:
Actually after what evazion said in forum #23990 made me rethink about it, and in a container or in container sounded better in my mind.
------
Hellbus said:
I could go for a change from girl_in_(a) tag type to just in_* then. Gender neutral, same format as the umbrella tag.
------
7HS said:
On that note, shouldn't the established "girl_in_a_whatever" tags (girl in a box, girl in a cup, girl in a bottle) be aliased to in_whatever (in_box, in_cup, in_bottle) for consistency and gender equality?
jxh2154 said:
This has come up a number of times, not sure where it really ended up. I'm tempted to just go gender neutral in_object and be done with it...
------
With just in Y, I guess everything would still be restricted to people like in container describes?
Updated by a moderator