Posted under General
Any reason why these two post got deleted and flagged as AI-generated? The artist literally includes his WIPs and process in the follow-up tweet itself... https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058730340320239851
In fact, he has multiple WIP posts all relating to this specific artwork: https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058698460266934527 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058702321232851177 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058711602338382054 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058728396503584962
Am I missing something?
hilandcow2 said in forum #451912:
Any reason why these two post got deleted and flagged as AI-generated? The artist literally includes his WIPs and process in the follow-up tweet itself... https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058730340320239851
In fact, he has multiple WIP posts all relating to this specific artwork: https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058698460266934527 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058702321232851177 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058711602338382054 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058728396503584962
Am I missing something?
This account was recently discussed in topic #22285, where your question fits more than here. The most detailed part of the discussion is in forum #451618.
A change from AI-generated to AI-assisted could be considered if there is human involvement, but damn… some of their stuff doesn’t look great: post #11590849, post #8422503, post #9163139, post #10127189, post #9655671, post #9366662.
hilandcow2 said in forum #451912:
Any reason why these two post got deleted and flagged as AI-generated? The artist literally includes his WIPs and process in the follow-up tweet itself... https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058730340320239851
In fact, he has multiple WIP posts all relating to this specific artwork: https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058698460266934527 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058702321232851177 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058711602338382054 https://x.com/fuunsoo/status/2058728396503584962
Am I missing something?
I changed the tags from ai-generated to ai-assisted. on his twitter he does show himself physically drawing on posts you didn't link so it's not fair to say he's fully generating, but it probably means he's Tracing an AI base, then going back over it with AI upscaling after he finishes the line work.
and like @aster1a posted, some of these have very little human touch.
WRS said in forum #451877:
If the only thing that's apparently drawn from scratch is the head and the rest of the body takes an existing art and just slightly modifies it, that still sounds like a third-party edit to me, with the only thing setting it aside from a headshop being that the head is properly drawn from scratch instead of being cut from a different sprite. When did a first pass on it while emptying out my queue, the body did not look even traced, and it's half of the visible character. It could've passed under official style if it was completely the artist's own work.
Approvers can't edit disapprovals anymore so even if I were to do another pass with new info in the comments or otherwise while it was in the queue (e.g. if you posted something before the 3 days were up), I can't change it anyway. I looked it over a few times first and it just looked like an edit to me. Signed, member three of the seemingly exclusive club.
I appreciate the response, and thank you for confirming my suspicions.
The core part of a headshop by our definition is that it has to be made by a completely unrelated third party.
Ie. if I myself were to take the head of post X by artist A and edited it onto the body of post Y by artist B, even if it looked somewhat decent I would have contributed zero artistic influence to the new image. Deleting these on sight only makes sense and aligns with our current rules.
Meanwhile an artist using an existing image and building upon it would fall under the definition of derivative work which encompasses everything from simple inspiration to outright plagiarism. post #11632244 would undoubtedly fall under the latter.
Appeal filed and I'll be withdrawing my membership application. I believe it’s in the broader interest of Danbooru as a whole for this club to remain exclusive.
post #11658355 (E) (Thank you!)
I suppose explicit images of men aren't as popular, but I do believe Chihiro is well-drawn here.
Updated by StarfishAtLarge
If possible, could an Approver please explain why these weren’t approved? I might upload some more of this artist's works and I would like to skip the works that I know won't be accepted. Any feedback would be appreciated.
post #11639741
post #11639788
post #11639859
post #11639888
post #11639905
post #11639929
post #11639945
post #11639950
post #11639959
post #11639963
Hi, could an Approver please explain why these weren't approved? If possible, I'd appreciate having them reconsidered.
post #6591069
post #6619648
post #6897983
Updated by SidBarrett
Wuthering waves:
post #11665460 General
post #11654437 sensitive
post #11645305 Sensitive
post #11640529 General
post #11631437 sensitive
post #11631275 sensitive
Why are these not approved?
I'd like to have this reinstated since it was unapproved for 8 months post #10194802
Talulah said in forum #451910:
Yaoi won't appeal to most approvers. Deleted posts don't get removed from the site unless they're illegal or the artist has them banned, so you'll usually still be able to see them.
..I figured as much but didn't want to assume. That's very unfortunate :/
Thanks for clearing things up, again my priority is my ability to view the images so it isn't the end of the world. I appreciate you.
i'd like to know why this post got rejected? can someone approve them?
post #11553629
post #11576956
post #11424651
post #11553479
post #11355630
post #11437668
post #11110467
post #11078186
What's wrong with this?
