AI-generated art check thread

lifeiseggg looks like a primarily AI gen account with some traced/hand-drawn stuff thrown into the mix. See flag reasons for post #11617565 and post #11623905, the garbled corset cross-lace and breastplate neck in twitter #2066478938512347470, split right ear in twitter #2066478983139709381 etc, all of which share a default SD resolution.

White background posts (post #11630102, post #11630119, post #11618371) are also full of diffusion noise with the exception of the one with a timelapse uploaded (post #11623949), even though they're all similarly crunchy jpegs. The timelapse's kind of unnatural and skips over several parts but I don't think it itself looks AI-generated, which makes me think that one's traced or assisted rather than fully generated like the rest.
@galaxymiku heads up since you've been uploading them.

didsomeonejustsayweeaboo said in forum #450779:

sorry if i should make a separate thread for this, but artist #604991 is an AI poster and I am trying to add 'do not repost' to the wiki article, but it only allows URLs. Is there a way to edit this??

URL-only artist entries and their corresponding wiki page entries are separate, you have to make a new wiki entry with the same name as the artist tag here: new

Diet_Soda said in forum #450907:
@galaxymiku heads up since you've been uploading them.

Sorry, missed the flags. Should i tag/flag the rest or something else? That's my first AI problem so i don't really know what to do.

galaxymiku said in forum #450925:

Sorry, missed the flags. Should i tag/flag the rest or something else? That's my first AI problem so i don't really know what to do.

I can flag them, you don't need to do anything. Was just letting you know to be cautious if you were planning on uploading more from that account.

post #11637679
post #11637849

Artist has a 12 out of 56 posts on their Pixiv self-tagged as AI-generated, examples: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

asset #48864429

I have no idea what's going on here, but the artist has no other art posts beyond one that's a completely different style, and the character's design here is all kinds of wrong (glasses instead of a monocle, hair rings are normally braided, why is there a hairclip?).

I'm pretty sure this is AI, but I'd like a double check before doing anything.

Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #451026:

asset #48864429

I have no idea what's going on here, but the artist has no other art posts beyond one that's a completely different style, and the character's design here is all kinds of wrong (glasses instead of a monocle, hair rings are normally braided, why is there a hairclip?).

I'm pretty sure this is AI, but I'd like a double check before doing anything.

Yes, AI+3D

LuxuryRay said in forum #450995:

post #11637679
post #11637849

Artist has a 12 out of 56 posts on their Pixiv self-tagged as AI-generated, examples: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

All AI.

NO_AI_ON_DANBOORU said in forum #451082:

Yes, AI+3D

Exactly what I thought. Figured as much, but never hurts to double check. Thank you!

post #11641863

Goldva said in comment #2609510:

It kind of looks like the kind of mistakes AI would make.

anonbl said in forum #451167:

post #11641863

That feet screams AI if I've ever seen one, looking at the latest X post of the artist also they have been called out by their only two commenters both pointing at the placement of the tail.

ggraphy said in forum #451179:

That feet screams AI if I've ever seen one, looking at the latest X post of the artist also they have been called out by their only two commenters both pointing at the placement of the tail.

There are sketches on the artist's second account:
twitter #2030098428190150876 (post #11641846)
twitter #2033560179191791898 (post #11641863)
twitter #2037376581291913409 (twitter #2068809003246006631)

Perhaps it is just bad anatomy or AI-assisted.

post #11648632

post #8780281

Could AI do this a year and a half ago?

ion288 said in forum #451278:

post #8780281

Could AI do this a year and a half ago?

Yes, but I'm honestly not seeing how this could be AI honestly. I could be wrong, but the only weird thing here are really bad toes, which can just as easily be normal artistic error.

post #11647309

I don't see previous discussions or any blatant AI artifacts in previous work

artms said in forum #451321:

post #11647309

I don't see previous discussions or any blatant AI artifacts in previous work

Humans don't draw hair like this, merging into itself.

I've had a suspicion for a while that Mewmaster93's art is mostly traced-over, ai-generated Hata4564-style pictures.

Mewmaster's stuff is WAY too similar to Hata's for it to be a mere coincidence. Even more alarming is that seemingly out of nowhere, Mewmaster's art started perfectly mimicking Hata's style?

Like, how did they go from this: https://x.com/mewmaster93/status/1966939941134385219/photo/1
To this: https://x.com/mewmaster93/status/1983247395505803409/photo/1
Within the span of a month?

Drew this: https://x.com/mewmaster93/status/2000657110791807440
Then THIS a month later?: https://x.com/mewmaster93/status/2010079198040248593/photo/1

The style and quality of their artwork isn't consistent either. This for example: post #10720079
The linework gives an impression of something that's traced, and even the bikini top straps don't match in shape or thickness (likely due to ai-generation).

Here's also an example of the artwork mimicry being TOO similar:
Mewmaster: post #11178958
Hata: post #10789530 / post #10714831/ post #7947860

ANON_TOKYO said in forum #451323:

Humans don't draw hair like this, merging into itself.

They absolutely do. In fact I do this. I'm not defending it, I'm just saying that real artists 100% do this too.

cihefk said in forum #393387:

Artist suujiniku uses AI. They openly started using AI in 2022 but I haven't seen them or anyone else talk about it since.

Things to note: It looks like AI, occasionally has some issues common in AI (e.g. four fingers), and most importantly, their output is insane. They upload incredibly often.

Aye.

Samples:

[--]

[Search for "suujiniku miyako_(blue_archive)" and check her collarbone area]
Two line not gonna meet, while the neck looks weird.

[Search for "suujiniku manhattan_cafe_(umamusume)" and check her hair between eyes]
The hair looks strange, probably ai-melt, or just should be like that.

[His latest post of don_quixote_(project_moon) ]
Check her hair above right eye.

Above all elsem the entire color scheme of this artist looks suspicious.

*btw, post can't include NSFW images, is this some new law or already being there for a while?
All 3 proof just cannot be posted here. I swear this is not a good idea for such theme.

Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #451307:

Yes, but I'm honestly not seeing how this could be AI honestly. I could be wrong, but the only weird thing here are really bad toes, which can just as easily be normal artistic error.

I think the artist is ai prompter.

post #8397881, see right eyebrow
post #8553295, see sandals
post #9908678 and children, check her clothes.

NO_AI_ON_DANBOORU said in forum #451478:

I think the artist is ai prompter.

post #8397881, see right eyebrow
post #8553295, see sandals
post #9908678 and children, check her clothes.

Just this is enough asset #48904227
Also, two right legs.