WRS said in forum #450758:
90 degree spine while being able to support tankers out front kills it for me.
So less of an artstyle or resolution issue and more of a posture one, understood.
Posted under General
WRS said in forum #450758:
90 degree spine while being able to support tankers out front kills it for me.
So less of an artstyle or resolution issue and more of a posture one, understood.
Kheas said in forum #450768:
So less of an artstyle or resolution issue and more of a posture one, understood.
Art can look good at any resolution, it's basically never the cause for disapproval. This post also isn't even that low resolution, you can compare it to some random other posts for that.
post #11547549
S, Dandelion from GF2
post #11560462
S, Narita from Umamusume
post #11583292
S, Haruna from Blue Archive
post #11588953
post #11588591
S, Makoto from Blue Archive
Check my scrapyard for more deletion! favgroup #53271
Updated by BMPT
post #11613288 - sensitive
post #11604325 - sensitive
post #11517152 - questionable
Why was these not approved?
Updated by Rimuru Tempest
post #10456178 Any clue on why this isn't accepted?
The closest thing to a guess I've got is that the image is really wide, so at a glance it's not as good.
I am not a mod though, so even this guess is probably wrong too.
post #11619670
Any reason on why this post did not get a pass?
I would appeal the post,but I am contemplating on how to write a solid appeal on this one.
Still under the approval process, not deleted yet. Yet I am incredibly anxious about the possibility of it being deleted despite the art’s good quality. I also feel like the appeal system doesn’t favor me. And yet, miraculously, post #8874554 was undeleted a month ago despite my appeal from closer to the initial upload date failing.
post #11619832 Why's this not improved?
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #451033:
post #11619670
Any reason on why this post did not get a pass?
I would appeal the post,but I am contemplating on how to write a solid appeal on this one.
While you already wrote your appeal, note that adding a reason is completely optional. It's fine to leave it blank if you can't think of anything to say. I usually don't write reasons for the posts I appeal unless it's something that might be easily missed (for example, pointing out a detail that makes it a revision instead of a duplicate). Sometimes, I'll appeal sourceless posts after finding and updating the source and mention that in my reason.
I also suggest leaving out phrases like "this deserves to be approved" since they don't actually add anything of value to the appeal and can come across as whiny. Saying the quality is good also doesn't hold much weight. After all, why would you appeal it if you didn't think it was good?
RaymooDev said in forum #451043:
Still under the approval process, not deleted yet. Yet I am incredibly anxious about the possibility of it being deleted despite the art’s good quality. I also feel like the appeal system doesn’t favor me. And yet, miraculously, post #8874554 was undeleted a month ago despite my appeal from closer to the initial upload date failing.
You posted it one day ago, which means there's still plenty of time before it's deleted. This thread is reserved for discussion about deleted posts. Asking about pending posts just clutters the thread.
CamillaxTharja29 said in forum #451045:
post #11619832 Why's this not improved?
You tagged it with third-party edit when it’s just photo-referenced, so someone unfamiliar with ToHeart may have not realized it. I’ll undelete it and fix the tags, but please be careful next time
Hello, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #6471943
post #6266406
Updated by SidBarrett
Just appealed post #11622321 that just got deleted. I believe the quality of the art is not only fine,but also consistent and in line with other approved arts of the same artist.
DoFlamon said in forum #444707:
post #11524284
post #11524345
post #11524447
post #11524591
post #11524698
post #11524794I don't think the drawing is bad enough to be taken down
Writing this again since I never got a response. Come on, they're not nearly bad enough quality-wise to deserve being removed.
Hopefully I can upload them again and at least some of them will pass this time.
SidBarrett said in forum #451073:
This one is tagged as a third-party edit so it's against the upload rules.
Bernkastel83 said in forum #451084:
This one is tagged as a third-party edit so it's against the upload rules.
And what do you think about the others?
SidBarrett said in forum #451085:
And what do you think about the others?
I'm not an approver so I won't comment on the others.
Variants of approved images that i wouldnt think are worse than their parent posts (mostly either slightly more or less suggestive versions of the approved image)
post #11619698
post #11618236
post #11618232
post #11454786
post #11454573
post #11341394
post #11339666
post #11269899
post #10502062
DoFlamon said in forum #451081:
Writing this again since I never got a response. Come on, they're not nearly bad enough quality-wise to deserve being removed.
Hopefully I can upload them again and at least some of them will pass this time.
You shouldn't reupload an image that failed to be approved. If you want you can go to an image and appeal it to send it through queue again and potentially get different Approvers to see it. I won't speak on the quality of what you've uploaded, but if your goal is to get promoted it can't hurt to go and see what type of images pass through queue.
Genshin Impact: questionable: post #11577936
Why is this not approved?
