post #11546589 (12 approvers)
Can someone take another look at this Gwen posts? Looks pretty ok
Posted under General
post #11546589 (12 approvers)
Can someone take another look at this Gwen posts? Looks pretty ok
What is up with approvers and nyantcha. I kid you not 8th or 9th time I’ve uploaded this artist and each and every single time it’s hit by disapproval after disapproval and there’s literally no quality drop from the other posts but it doesn’t get approved until the last day or officially brought up. Hell once I uploaded one where a contributor uploaded a textless version after and the post I uploaded went unapproved for days.
Onryo25 said in forum #445037:
What is up with approvers and nyantcha. I kid you not 8th or 9th time I’ve uploaded this artist and each and every single time it’s hit by disapproval after disapproval and there’s literally no quality drop from the other posts but it doesn’t get approved until the last day or officially brought up. Hell once I uploaded one where a contributor uploaded a textless version after and the post I uploaded went unapproved for days.
This image still has a good amount of time left in queue, wait a few days and see if it gets approved
Hello, I think post #10518912 should be approved. All uploads of the same style that were uploaded around it were approved and are of the same quality
TheGamingRodent said in forum #445020:
post #11546589 (12 approvers)
Can someone take another look at this Gwen posts? Looks pretty ok
The shot on the right makes her legs twice the length of her torso which is kinda bad.
Hello, I'm not sure why post #11543166 didn't get approved, any ideas why?
Why weren’t these two approved? If it was just a coincidence, you don’t need to answer. transrated
post #11544676
post #11546130
post #11542675
post #11533483
post #11529299
post #11529288
Any feedback on these 4?
Jinzo_Jacker said in forum #420891:
textless_version status:active parent:deleted
textless_version status:deleted child:activeThis still doesn't make sense to me.
Is presence of text really a deciding factor on whether a post should be active?
This still bothers me.
Gonna appeal something from here each day.
Feel free to fix ahead of time.
Hello, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #8205569
post #7617052
Updated by SidBarrett
TheGamingRodent said in forum #445020:
post #11546589 (12 approvers)
Can someone take another look at this Gwen posts? Looks pretty ok
Can you stop adding the disapproval count, it does nothing except make yourself look worse.
Also, you've been here a while, yet almost every post of yours here is basically the same story: some are fine but overlooked, other have various issues that you somehow failed to spot despite it "looking good" to you. Asking for feedback is fine, but there comes a point where it's just wasting approver's time.
People, me included, are more inclined to answer builders asking for feedback as they're more likely to take the advice to heart, so please show us that you're actually trying this. As I said, some of your posts definitely are fine and just got overlooked, so at least try appealing and analyzing the posts further before asking here.
ANON_TOKYO said in forum #445089:
Can you stop adding the disapproval count, it does nothing except make yourself look worse.
Also, you've been here a while, yet almost every post of yours here is basically the same story: some are fine but overlooked, other have various issues that you somehow failed to spot despite it "looking good" to you. Asking for feedback is fine, but there comes a point where it's just wasting approver's time.
People, me included, are more inclined to answer builders asking for feedback as they're more likely to take the advice to heart, so please show us that you're actually trying this. As I said, some of your posts definitely are fine and just got overlooked, so at least try appealing and analyzing the posts further before asking here.
Okay sure, ignore all the other times people included the disapproval count and come at me, sure, why not
And I was trying to ask what was wrong with the image as there was only 12 approvers looking at it so I added that count cuz I was curious as to why
Just curious if there was an issue on my art that prevented it from being approved. I'm the original artist for it, and would just like to know for the future. tyy for any help
Onryo25 said in forum #445037:
[..]
I don't see what the problem is given that they've all been approved eventually. Sometimes it takes the right approver to see it and that includes even after it's been deleted. There are also other chances for it to get approved outside of the three days in the modqueue such as an appeal, a deep dive into deletions to see if there's anything worth undeleting and upon being checked for a promotion. Try relaxing a little - it worked for me when I was stuck in the modqueue and I eventually figured out what worked.
Jinzo_Jacker said in forum #445068:
[..]
You shouldn't call attention to posts in bulk like this, preferring instead to appeal ones that you think look good enough to be active and worth a second review. Some of these don't look good and might incline someone to flag the ones that are active. It's also not really that accurate, given post #9988459 was flagged due to bad anatomy but appears in the search results because post #9988460 and post #9988471 are active child posts, notwithstanding that it should probably be pooled anyway.
TheGamingRodent said in forum #445020:
Can someone take another look at this Gwen posts? Looks pretty ok
Looks pretty weird, I don't like the rightmost view of the character. The attempt to emphasize the lower body here resulted in the upper body looking detached, as if someone opened a 3D modeling program and dragged it across a horizontal axis some.
TheGamingRodent said in forum #445095:
Okay sure, ignore all the other times people included the disapproval count and come at me, sure, why not
And I was trying to ask what was wrong with the image as there was only 12 approvers looking at it so I added that count cuz I was curious as to why
As I told unrecognized taste in forum #442994 about their translation topic bumps, the same applies for you - you happen to be one of the users who posts the most in this topic, so when you do it, it's going to be noticed more. I'm not entirely of the same opinion that you need to stop adding it, however I don't think there's any use to including the number of approvers who looked at your post because it might be what skews some of your thinking in regards to an approval. Additionally, if people see a builder doing it, they might learn the wrong lessons and start copying you, which is why you're being told this instead of someone else.
One of the reasons it's hard to give you feedback specifically, besides the volume at which you post in here, is that it feels as though you aren't using feedback, disapproval messages or your own deletions to constructively build upon your ability to analyse your own posts for what might be striking negatively with approvers (e.g. anatomy issues).
Almost all your posts you say "looks good" and appeal with "may need another chance" (which you already give it by appealing), and I can understand having a bias towards your own posts' quality, but you also need to be able to fight through that bias and recognise when it's not that good. Being able to be critical of your own quality control is also an important part of becoming a Contributor if that's your aim, not just having a low amount of recent deletions.
I can't promote you if I can't trust that you won't just immediately dump posts with noticeable issues or poor quality upon giving you the privilege to skip the modqueue.
post #11549787
post #11549717
post #11549522post #11549353
post #11549088
post #11548594
post #9546722post #9546689
post #9546642
post #9546613
post #9546585
post #9546581
post #9546518
Could I get some feedback on these?
And just wondering-does typical anime style get a free pass way easier than western cartoon styles here? It feels like some western art still manages to pass the quality check, though. Honestly, I pretty love the hybrid art style that sits right in between the two.
Updated by yssuperyu
yssuperyu said in forum #445099:
And just wondering-does typical anime style get a free pass way easier than western cartoon styles here? It feels like some western art still manages to pass the quality check, though. Honestly, I pretty love the hybrid art style that sits right in between the two.
We are an anime imageboard first and foremost, so yes.
But the problem here isn't the hybridisation of art styles, it's the proportions.
Things like very wide hips or huge butts and chests have a harder time since we hold those to a higher quality standard.
Shibi said in forum #445103:
We are an anime imageboard first and foremost, so yes.
But the problem here isn't the hybridisation of art styles, it's the proportions.
Things like very wide hips or huge butts and chests have a harder time since we hold those to a higher quality standard.
Ah, that makes sense. Taiger's art definitely leans heavily into exaggerated proportions. I guess I was too focused on the coloring and facial expressions to notice the anatomy standards. Thanks for clarifying!
Shibi said in forum #445103:
We are an anime imageboard first and foremost, so yes.
But the problem here isn't the hybridisation of art styles, it's the proportions.
Things like very wide hips or huge butts and chests have a harder time since we hold those to a higher quality standard.
About that, you said huge butt or large breast tend to less approved, so most art that get approved immediately is general rating? With no cleavage showing? And what makes uploads get general rating? Because i upload what i thought is rated general after read help:upload but somehow rating changes to sensitive and some approver tend approve general rated upload most of time
Care to explain to me?
Thank in advance
Hello there!
I asked this a few days ago but as I didn't get a response, I'm posting here again.
I'm sorry if I shouldn't do this.
I would like to get some information as to why they weren't approved and some advice about these two posts:
Thanks in advance and sorry for disturbing!
WRS said in forum #445098:
You shouldn't call attention to posts in bulk like this, preferring instead to appeal ones that you think look good enough to be active and worth a second review. Some of these don't look good and might incline someone to flag the ones that are active. It's also not really that accurate, given post #9988459 was flagged due to bad anatomy but appears in the search results because post #9988460 and post #9988471 are active child posts, notwithstanding that it should probably be pooled anyway.
I know I didn't say "flagging" in my post, but I think the flagging of bad active posts is a completely acceptable outcome.
Theres like maybe 5 cases where the textless_version status:active parent:deleted / textless_version status:deleted child:active makes sense.