Is passive voyeurism a useful tag

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=passive_voyeurism

I see this tag, but most of the posts already overlap with voyeurism.

Is this tag useful at all? Not being noticed is common to voyeurism already.

@evenstary, you created passive voyeurism, could you explain why this tag is needed?

BUR #59963 has been rejected.

nuke passive_voyeurism

Seems like a pointless tag, lets leave it to a vote.

I'd argue post #101875 is significantly different than post #10884416.
It's not about being unnoticed, but being forced into a voyeuristic scenario by an 'exhibitionist' act being performed in their presence: i.e. One character waking up to find their roommate engaging in yobai and feigning sleep to not interfere is evidently distinct from a character actively peeking into a door left open, or watching a couple from across the street a la Rear Window.

Freshblink said in forum #441250:

BUR #59963 has been rejected.

nuke passive_voyeurism

Seems like a pointless tag, lets leave it to a vote.

Also, I'm unsure on how to vote. Is a vote up for 'yes, we should nuke passive_voyeurism", or "yes, passive voyeurism is a useful tag"?

Voting up means you agree with the BUR (nuking the tag). I agree that it is worth making a distinction between cases where the voyeur is known or not, so -1. The tag name could be better though.

accidental voyeurism would be my vote to go along with accidental exposure

BUR #59983 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

rename passive_voyeurism -> accidental_voyeurism
create implication accidental_voyeurism -> voyeurism

Well here's the alternate.

I do like this name better.

"incidental" seems like a closer word to what the tag is describing.

The bulk update request #59963 (forum #441250) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #59983 (forum #441316) has been approved by @nonamethanks.