Posted under General
ANON_TOKYO said in forum #433144:
This is not what this thread is for. Also you're wrong.
Fine, no further replies. Just tell me what's wrong, ok?
post #11081725 <----
post #11111205 <---- I strongly recommend these 2
post #11116676
post #11116677
post #11106237
Updated by T-447AVBM
Any reason why this didn't go through? Nicely drawn
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #433059:
This is really a huge gripe of mine concerning this sites. As a great Fan of FGO Ishtar and other Fate characters. I often find out that many of the Ishtar arts that I consider high qualities are rejected by “Approvers who think they are of poor quality.” One of the reasons that I find it unacceptable,is that for post #11131645. The approvers said that they would skip through it only because “It is just cropped version of a preexisting art.” However,that cropped image was supposed to be a set with the other image in the original Pixiv post. If that image managed to stay on the site for years,then so should post #11131645. At least it is what I think. In addition,I also consider these being nice quality,but are not approved as fast as other uploads:
post #11150574
post #11150588
post #11150597
post #11150475
post #11150455
post #11149423
post #11149371
post #11144486If I have other major gripe on the approvals. It is probably: Some approvers seemed to be too fixated on some trivial errors that are otherwise acceptable to the uploaders.
For instance,an uploaded might upload a piece of art that he/she considered “High Quality.” Sometimes,the art might have some anatomical errors. However,from my point of view,some arts deserves to get a stay on the site despite the errors,as long as the overall quality is good,they should be approved rather than being deemed “Low/Poor quality” due to the slightest error.
Yeah, it’s frustrating that approvers don’t approve
Chainsawman: General
These are pretty good, so why are these not approved?
Updated by GolfFoxtrotLima
GolfFoxtrotLima said in forum #433212:
Chainsawman: General
These are pretty good, so why are these not approved?
Sorry I'm an approver so I don't approve.
They're fine so I approved them. Sometimes things like this get missed when they go through queue and comics are things that are seemingly more prone to this. For comics like these, make sure you're either parenting them or making a series pool for them so that it's easier to follow for a viewer. See help:post relationships and help:pools for further help.
Feel free to up the last two pages from the same source whilst following the advice above and I'll approve them. If I don't after three days then feel free to dmail me to remind me. (Only do so for this particular comic, I will ignore/report dmailing for approvals for anything else other than my upload bounties).
TheGamingRodent said in forum #433201:
Any reason why this didn't go through? Nicely drawn
The face in particular is pretty off-putting.
T-447AVBM said in forum #433145:
Fine, no further replies. Just tell me what's wrong, ok?
post #11081725 <----
post #11111205 <---- I strongly recommend these 2
post #11116676
post #11116677
post #11106237
I do not like the generally anatomy and quality of all of these.
post #11133210 (S; don't see the poor quality here)
post #11133345 (E)
post #11134167 (E)
Alright, why didn't these go through? I don't see anything wrong with them anf they're pretty nicely drawn
Updated by TheGamingRodent
I know bias and all (basically all your forum posts here and appeals are the same "nothing wrong nicely drawn") but post #11133210 is pretty bad to me. Tiny legs and a confusing perspective on top of a torso angled in a way that doesn't really make any sense.
WRS said in forum #433308:
I know bias and all (basically all your forum posts here and appeals are the same "nothing wrong nicely drawn") but post #11133210 is pretty bad to me. Tiny legs and a confusing perspective on top of a torso angled in a way that doesn't really make any sense.
Already discussed on 'cord, but I do agree the angel is bad and the tiny legs, also when you use every other word to describe a posts if you think is nicely drawn, what other words can be used?
Can I get some feedback on post #11137987 (S)? It's a colored version the artist made of an earlier artwork (parented).
Updated by eqological
why picturd deleted? they're a very good artist objectively speaking
I just really want to know what it is about this art that made the approvers not like it, when compared to any other RWBY art within Danbooru.
post #11138978
Anyone got any idea on why this post might have been deleted?
why was this one deleted?
post #11087464
DNN4 said in forum #433356:
post #11138978
Anyone got any idea on why this post might have been deleted?
Danbooru's allergy to sketches. Undeleted.
WRS said in forum #433389:
Danbooru's allergy to sketches. Undeleted.
thx
NiceLittleDan said in forum #433216:
Sorry I'm an approver so I don't approve.They're fine so I approved them. Sometimes things like this get missed when they go through queue and comics are things that are seemingly more prone to this. For comics like these, make sure you're either parenting them or making a series pool for them so that it's easier to follow for a viewer. See help:post relationships and help:pools for further help.
Feel free to up the last two pages from the same source whilst following the advice above and I'll approve them. If I don't after three days then feel free to dmail me to remind me. (Only do so for this particular comic, I will ignore/report dmailing for approvals for anything else other than my upload bounties).
Ok
Zenless zone zero:
post #9937967 General
This is pretty good for a piece of fan art, so why is this not approved?
Not one of mine, but:
post #10663922 (S)
